VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Moinul Hoque @ Monirul Ali @ Monirul Hoque v. The Union of India and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
26 August 2024
Bench
Kalyan Rai Surana, Soumitra Saikia
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 2524/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 27.08.2024 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. J. Payeng, learned standing counsel for the Home Department; Ms. P. Barua, learned standing counsel for the ECI; and Mr. H.K. Hazarika, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent no.4. None appears on call for the Union of India.

¶2This interlocutory application has been filed for correction of the cause title of WP(C) 3171/2024 in respect of respondent nos.3 and 4 as well as for consequential correction of the order dated 05.08.2024, passed by this Court in the said writ petition so as to enable the petitioner to appear before the jurisdictional Superintendent of Police (Border), Golaghat instead of the Page No.# 4/5 Superintendent of Police (Border), Jorhat.

¶3On a query of the Court, the learned standing counsel for the Home Department has submitted that the Foreigners Tribunal, Jorhat also has jurisdiction over the Golaghat District and as the petitioner is a resident of Golaghat District and the reference was also made by the Superintendent of Police (Border), Golaghat, bail is required to be taken before the said authority. Accordingly, the prayer made in this interlocutory application is allowed.

¶4The nomenclature of respondent no.3 shall now be read as Superintendent of Police (Border), Golaghat in substitution of the existing cause title of respondent no.3, who was the Superintendent of Police (Border), Jorhat.

¶5The nomenclature of respondent no.4 shall now be read as District Commissioner, Golaghat in substitution of the existing cause title of respondent no.4, who was the District Commissioner, Jorhat.

¶6We take note of the mistake in the name of opposite party no.4 as the authority is no longer the Deputy Commissioner, Golaghat, but it is District Commissioner, Golaghat.

¶7The learned counsel for the applicant prays to permit him to submit an amended cause title within 2 (two) days before the concerned AO(J), who is the in-charge of the FT matters.

¶8Pending submission of the amended cause title interlocutory application, the substitution of respondent no.4 is allowed.

¶9Resultantly, the directions contained in paragraph 6 and 7 of the order dated 05.08.2024, passed in WP(C) 3171/2024 shall now be read as follows: "6. Subject to taking steps on the respondents as directed above, in the interim, the petitioner, namely, Moinul Hoque @ Monirul Ali @ Monirul Hoque, if has not already detained in custody, shall not be Page No.# 5/5 taken into custody and deported from the territory of India, on condition that he shall appear before the Superintendent of Police (Border), Golaghat within 10 (ten) days from today during the office hours and shall furnish a bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the said authority. Further, the Superintendent of Police (Border), Golaghat, is directed that on appearance of the petitioner within the period indicated above, the biometrics of the iris of both eyes, the fingerprints of both hands and the photographs of the petitioner shall be obtained, where after, he shall be allowed to remain on bail.

¶7On his appearance before the Superintendent of Police (Border), Golaghat, as directed above, the said authority shall obtain necessary information and documentation as required under the Rules from the petitioner for securing his presence."

¶10Accordingly, paragraph 6 and 7 of the order dated 05.08.2024, passed in WP(C) 3171/2024 shall be read together with order passed today in this interlocutory application.

¶11This interlocutory application stands allowed.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010165682024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2524/2024o MOINULoHOQUEo@oMONIRULoALIo@oMONIRULoHOQUEo S/O-oLT.oMOTIURoRAHMANo@oMATURoRAHMAN,o R/O-oVILL.oNO.o1oARUNADOIoGAON,o GOMARIGURI,o P.O.oANDoP.S.-oMERAPANI,o DISTRICT-oGOLAGHATo(ASSAM). VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORSo TOoBEoREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoMINISTRYoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,oNEWoDELHI- 1. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oTOoBEoREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoOFo HOMEoDEPARTMENT o DISPUR oGUWAHATI oASSAM. 3:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(BORDER) oJORHAT oASSAM oPIN-o785700. 4:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oJORHAT oP.O.oANDoDIST.-oJORHAT oASSAM o PIN-o785001. Page No.# 2/5 5:THE ASSAM STATE CO-ORDINATOR OF NRC BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-5. 6:THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NEW DELHI Advocate for the Petitioner : S AHMED, MS A HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, F.T,SC, ECI Linked Case : WP(C)/3171/2024 MOINUL HOQUE @ MONIRUL ALI @ MONIRUL HOQUE S/O- LT. MOTIUR RAHMAN @ MATUR RAHMAN R/O- VILL. NO. 1 ARUNADOI GAON GOMARIGURI P.O. AND P.S.- MERAPANI DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM). VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI-1. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY OF HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM. 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) JORHAT Page No.# 3/5 ASSAM PIN- 785700. 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JORHAT P.O. AND DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001. 5:THE ASSAM STATE CO-ORDINATOR OF NRC BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-5. 6:THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NEW DELHI. ------------ Advocate for : S AHMED Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.