VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Rituparna Pathak v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
28 August 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2469/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 29-08-2024 Heard Mr. F. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner Rituparna Pathak, who has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since

10.07.2024 in connection with Patacharkuchi Police Station Case No. 125/2024 Page No.# 2/3 under Sections 420/406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶2Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner.

¶3The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has taken Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs) from the informant with intent to cheat the informant in the garb of issuing a Fixed Deposit Certificate.

¶4It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is behind bars for 49 (Forty Nine) days. It is submitted that the petitioner's further custodial detention may not be required for the progress of investigation.

¶5I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection. I have considered the length of detention of the petitioner. I have scrutinized the Case Diary. I have also considered the progress of investigation.

¶6Considering all aspects, petition is allowed.

¶7The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Eleka Magistrate under the conditions that :

(i) Petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged.

(ii) Petitioner shall cooperate with the remaining part of the investigation.

(iii) Petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission.

¶8On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶9In terms of the above observation, this Bail Application stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3

¶10Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010165772024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2469/2024 RITUPARNA PATHAK S/O DALIM CHANDRA PATHAK, VILL- HOUSE NO. 1, GANESH MANDIR PATH, RUPNAGAR, P.S.-BHANGAGARH, DIST-KAMRUP VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. FIRUZ KHAN, P. NATH,RHITUSHREE TALUKDAR,MR. ABHIJIT MENA,MR. T K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.