VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Ngangom Ranjita Devi and Anr v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
13 June 2024
Bench
Budi Habungauthor
Case no.
MACApp. 530/2022

Judgment

Judgment and Order (CAV)

Date : 14-06-2024

¶1This appeal has been preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the impugned Judgment and Order dated

04.07.2017, passed by the learned Court of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bongaigaon in MAC Case No.21/2015, whereby the respondent/Oriental Insurance Company Limited has been directed to pay compensation amount of Rs.34,10,562/-only to the claimant along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e., from 21.02.2015 till its realization.

¶2Heard Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, learned counsel for the appellant. I have also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent/Oriental Insurance Company Limited.

¶3At the very outset of hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants has made it clear that the factum of the case is not disputed. He further made it clear that in the instant case, the appellant has a limited prayer specifically for inclusion of the future prospect of the deceased in the award as the same has not been included in the impugned Judgment and award. For better Page No.# 3/6 understanding, the prayer of the appellant/claimants for inclusion as stated below:

Sl. No. Heads Calculation Income after deduction of Tax (as in the impugned order) Rs. 2,81,079/-Rs. 1,40,539.50/-Future Prospect + Income Rs. 1,40,539.50 + 2,81,079 = Rs.4,21,618.5/-Deduction of personal Rs. 4,21,618.5 – 1,40,539.5 = Rs. 2,81,079/-Multiplier by : 17 Rs.(2,81,079 x 17) = Rs. 47,78,343/-

¶4The learned counsel for the respondent/Insurance Company submits that he has agreed and accepted the above proposal made by the appellant for enhancement. However, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the claimants is not entitle for any interest on the above proposed amount on future prospect; hence, no interest shall accrue against the above income of future prospect to be awarded to the appellant.

¶5The learned counsel for the appellant/claimant has also acceded to the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent/ Oriental Insurance Company that there shall be no interest accrue on the future prospect to be added into the award. Page No.# 4/6

¶6It is submitted that both the parties have mutually settled the matter and agreed for addition of "Future Prospect" in the final award granted to the appellant/claimant. It is further submitted that they have worked out the proposed modified in the original award by adding future prospect in the award and the same has been placed before this Court for consideration, which is taken on record. The proposal submitted by the parties are reproduced below: Sl No. Heads Calculation Income after deduction of Tax (as in the impugned order) Rs. 2,81,079/-

Rs. 1,40,539.50/-Future Prospect + Income Rs. 1,40,539.50 + 2,81,079 = Rs.4,21,618.5/-

Deduction

of

personal Rs. 4,21,618.5 – 1,40,539.5 = Rs. 2,81,079/-Multiplier : 17 Rs.(2,81,079 x 17) = Rs. 47,78,343/-

¶7Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and having examined the record and the proposed modification of the awarded amount by including additional award under head "Future Prospect" in the original award, which has been mutually agreed upon by the parties, this Court is satisfied that the parties have reached on consensus for modification of the quantum by adding award under head "Future Prospect" in the original award.

¶8Having taken into account the above mentioned proposed addition for addition of award, this Court hereby allows the mutually agreed Page No.# 5/6 terms of modification and addition on the quantum of compensation calculated by the parties as indicated above. Thus, after addition, the detail of the modified compensation awarded amount and its distribution are as follows:

Sl. No. HEADS CALCULATION

(i) Monthly salary Rs.26,356/-

(ii) Net salary Rs.24,174/-

(iii) Annual salary Rs.2,90,088/- (Rs.24,174 x 12)

(iv) Standard deduction Rs.2,00,000/-

(v) Actual taxable income Rs.90,088/- (Rs.2,90,088 – 2,00,000)

(vi) Tax on income (less 10%) Rs.9,009/-

(vii) Income after deduction of tax Rs.2,81,079/- (Rs.2,90,088 – Rs.9,009)

(viii) Rs.1,40,539.50/-

(ix) Future Prospect + Income Rs.1,40,539.50+2,81,079= Rs.4,21,618.5

(x) Deduction of personal Rs.4,21,618.5 – 1,40,539.5=Rs.2,81,079/-

(xi) Multiplier 17 Rs. (2,81,079 x 17)=Rs.47,78,343/-

(xii) Loss of Dependency Rs.47,78,343/-

(xiii) Loss of Consortium Rs.48,400/-

(xiv) Loss of Care and guidance for minor Rs.48,400/-

(xv) Funeral expenses Rs.18,150/-

(xvi) Loss of Estate Rs.18,150/-

Total = Rs.49,11,443/-

¶9Accordingly, the respondent/Oriental Insurance Company Limited is directed to pay a compensation amount of Rs. 49,11,443/-(Rupees Forty Nine lakh Eleven thousand Four hundred Forty Three only), to Page No.# 6/6 the claimants along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e., from 21.02.2015 till its realization.

¶10However, it is made clear that the future prospect amounting to Rs.1,40,539.50/- only, will not bear any interest from 21.02.2015 till its realization (i.e. on Rs.1,43,539.50x17 = Rs.23,89,171/-).

¶11The respondent/ Oriental Insurance Company is directed to pay the said amount in terms of the direction of the learned tribunal in Judgment and Order dated 04.07.2017, within a period of 6(six) weeks from the date of received of this order.

¶12The appeal is allowed to the extent as indicated above, and the Judgment and award of the learned tribunal dated 04.07.2017 shall stands modified accordingly.

¶13With the observation made above, the appeal is disposed in terms above.

¶14Send the record back immediately.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/6 GAHC010167112022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oMACApp./530/2022ooooooooo NGANGOMoRANJITAoDEVIoANDoANRo W/OoLATEoNGoROMESHoSINGH,oVILLAGEoTOUBULoMANINGoLEIKAI,oPO,oPS ANDoDISToBISHNUPUR,oMANIPUR,o795126 2:oNGoRENJNARAoDEVI oD/OoLATEoNGoROMESHoSINGH o VILLAGEoTOUBULoMANINGoLEIKAI o PO oPSoANDoDISToBISHNUPUR oMANIPUR o795126 oBEINGoMINORoTOoBEoREPRESENTEDoBYoHERoMOTHERoCUMoNATURALo GUARDIANoAPPELANToNO.o VERSUSo ORIENTALoINSURANCEoCO.oLTDoANDo3oORSo CHRISTAINoBASTI,oAMARVATIoPATH,oGSoROAD,oGUWAHATIo7811005oDISTo KAMRUPoMoASSAM,oINSURERoOFoTHEoVEHICLEoNO.oAS-18/C-0328(TRUCK) 2:SMT.oMAMATAoSAHA oW/OoSRIoHARUoSAHA o RESIDENToOFoBOROoBAZAAR oBToROAD oWARDoNO.o10 BONGAIGAON oPOoANDoDISToBONGAIGAON oASSAMo783380o OWNERoOFoVEHICLEoNO.oAS-18/C-0328(TRUCKo Page No.# 2/6 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B J MUKHERJEE Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H BURAGOHAIN (r-2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.