- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 February 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- WP(C) 5781/2021
Judgment
O R D E R
09.02.2024 This is an application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the Petitioner is aggrieved for non-payment of the ex-gratia relief to which the Petitioner being the wife of the deceased is entitled in terms with the notification dated 15.11.2014.
¶2The brief facts of the instant case is that on 30.07.2019 at about
1.30 P.M., while the wife of the petitioner namely Batashi Begum @ Batashi Khatun was proceeding from Mairamara towards Howly Town along with her elder sister Rabiya Khatun & Mairamara Khatun, as a pedestrian by their left side and when they reached near Howly High School play ground, suddenly a motor cycle bearing Regd. No. AS-15-D-1086 which was being ridden by its rider rashly and negligently came from opposite direction by over taking a car and hit the wife of the petitioner from the front side. As a result, the wife of the petitioner fell down and sustained multiple grievous injuries. Immediately after the incident, the injured was taken to the Howly CHC, wherefrom she was referred to FAAMCH and after that she was shifted to GMCH due to her critical condition. But during the course of her treatment, she succumbed to the injuries on 01.08.2019 at G.M.C.H. Thereupon, the Petitioner had Page No.# 3/4 in terms with the notification dated 15.11.2014 filed a representation dated 24.12.2020 before the respondent No.2 praying for ex-gratia payment of an amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. But the Respondent No.2 did not take any action for the payment to which the petitioner is entitled to in terms with the notification dated 15.11.2014.
¶3Being aggrieved, for non consideration of the request made by the Petitioner, the Petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
¶4Mrs. P. R. Mahanta, learned Standing counsel, Revenue Department appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 submits that in similar matters this Court had issued directions for making payment after making due verification.
¶5Taking into consideration the specific stand taken by the Petitioner on the basis of the notification dated 15.11.2014 and also the submission of Mrs. P. R. Mahanta, learned Standing counsel, Revenue Department to the effect that in respect to similarly situated persons this Court had passed directions for making payment after making due verification, this court is therefore of the opinion that it would be in the interest of justice that the instant petition be disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No.1 to consider the prayer of the Petitioner as regards the entitlement in terms with the notification dated 15.11.2014 and after due verification as regards the Petitioner's entitlement if it is found that the Petitioner is entitled, the said ex-gratia payment of Rs.2,00,000/- may be released to the Petitioner.
¶6It is further directed that the entire exercise be completed within a Page No.# 4/4 period of 3 (three) months from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the Commissioner & Secretary, to the Government of Assam, Revenue (Relief and Rehabilitation) Disaster Management Department.
¶7The Petitioner is further directed to submit the Next of Kin Certificate to the Commissioner & Secretary, to the Government of Assam, Revenue (Relief and Rehabilitation) Disaster Management Department along with the certified copy of this order.
¶8It is however observed that if in the meantime, the application of the petitioner dated 24.12.2020 has already been considered by the respondent authorities and/or the amount has already been disbursed, the question of the compliance with the above directions do not arise.
¶9With above observations and directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010167892021 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5781/2021o BASERoSIDARo@oABDULoBASERoSIKDARo S/OoLATEoTAMEZoSIKDAR,oRESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNALIGAON,oPOo NALIGAON,PSoSARTHEBARI,oDISToBARPETA,ASSAMo781352 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.o OFoASSAM,oREVENUEoANDoDISASTERoMANAGEMENToDEPARTMENTo (RELIEFoANDoREHABILATIONoBRANCH)oDISPURoGUWAHATIo781006 2:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oBARPETA oASSAM o781301 3:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICER oSARTHEBARIoREVENUEoCIRCLE oPOoANDoPSoSARTHEBARI oDISToBARPETA oASSAM o781307 4:THEoOFFICERoINoCHARGE oHOWLYoPOLICEoSTATION oDISToBARPETA oASSAMo78131o Forkthekpetitionerk(s)kkkkkkk:kMr.kR.kDeka,kAdvocatekk Page No.# 2/4 For the respondent (s) : Ms. S. Baruah, Govt. Advocate, Assam Mrs. P. R. Mahanta, SC, Revenue BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.