VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Laxman Sonari v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
29 September 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 2197/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 30-09-2024 Heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Laxman Sonari, who has filed this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with prayer for pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Hojai Police Station Case No. 238/2024 under Sections 303(2)/317(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Naya Sanhita, 2023. Page No.# 2/3

¶2Heard Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection against the petitioner's prayer for bail.

¶3I have perused the case diary and also the materials available on record.

¶4The FIR unfolds that the investigating team based on GD Entry No. 04 dated

12.08.2024 proceeded to Gobindapally for an enquiry on receiving the information of smuggling of gold. The house of Rahul Debnath was searched and cash of Rs.44,10,900/- (Rupees Forty Four Lacs Ten Thousand Nine Hundred) was found in the rented room of the accused named in the FIR. When confronted, the accused failed to give any satisfactory reply relating to the source of the money. It was assumed that the amount which was recovered was definitely relating to smuggled gold.

¶5It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is a businessman by profession and is running his jewellery shop in the name of Maa Yashoda Jewellery at Natun Bazar, Hojai which mainly deals with silver ornaments. It is also submitted that one of the accused named in the FIR Biplab Mazumdar has been arrested in connection with this case. It is submitted that the petitioner is innocent but he is apprehending arrest as Biplab Mazumdar is his employee.

¶6I have considered the submissions at the Bar and also scrutinized the case diary. The petitioner has appeared before the I/O and has cooperated with the investigation. The petitioner has not violated the bail condition as imposed by this Court.

¶7Considering all aspect, the interim bail order 22.08.2024 is hereby made absolute with the same terms and conditions. Page No.# 3/3

¶8Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of.

¶9Send back the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010170912024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2197/2024 LAXMAN SONARI S/O LATE JAMUNA SONARI R/O RAMPUR ROAD, NEW MARKET, P.S. AND DIST. HOJAI- 782435 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C KEYAL, K JAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.