- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 19 September 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- AB 2227/2024
Judgment
ORDER 20-09-2024 Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. Mr. Munir, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are some inadvertent mistakes in this pre-arrest bail application and as such, prays for withdrawal of this pre-arrest bail application, so that he can file appropriate application Page No.# 2/2 without any such mistakes seen in this pre-arrest bail application, to which Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has no objection. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application stands dismissed, on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010172852024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2227/2024 SATYEN KUMAR SARMA S/O BHABEN KUMAR SARMA R/O SUGAM PATH, FATASIL AMBARI, P.S. FATASIL AMBARI DIST.KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUNIR, MR. S RANA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.