Mustt. Rupjan Bibi @ Rupjan v. The Union of India and 5 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010174072019 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5694/2019o MUSTT.oRUPJANoBIBIo@oRUPJANo W/OoMD.oSARFAToALI,oR/OoVILL-KUMARGAON,oP.O.oANDoP.S.-RUPOHIHAT,o DIST-NAGAON,oASSAM,oPIN-782003 VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORS.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoHOMEoDEPARTMENT,oNEWoDELHI-110001 2:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oNIRVACHANoSADAN oASHOKAoROAD oNEWoDELHI oPIN-110001 3:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6 4:THEoCOORDINATOR oNATIONALoREGISTERoOFoCITIZENSo(NRC) oASSAM 5:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oNAGAON oASSAM oPIN-782003 6:THEoPRESIDINGoOFFICER Page No.# 2/2 FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL (3RD) NAGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND O R D E R

01.04.2024 (M.R. Pathak, J) No representation on behalf of the petitioner on call. Petitioner remained unrepresented in the first half when the matter was taken up for consideration. In the second half, the matter was called twice.

¶2We have also seen that on earlier two occasions i.e. 29.09.2023 and

08.11.2019, the petitioner remained unrepresented.

¶3Heard Mr. A.I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel, Election Commission of India for the respondent No. 2 and Mr. J. Payeng, learned Standing Counsel, Home Department, Assam for the respondent Nos. 3 and 5.

¶4The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant