Ikbal Hussain and 3 Ors v. The State of Assam and Anr

ORDER Date :09.09.2024

¶1Heard Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

¶2This application has been preferred under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 by the petitioner, namely (1) Ikbal Hussain, (2) Abdul Hamid, (3) Mijanul Haque @ Abdul Mijanur, and (4) Sadiqul Islam, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Moirabari P. S. Case No. 125/2024 registered under Sections 318

(4)/316(2)/127(2)/64/77/75 of the BNS, 2023.

¶3The gist of the accusation in this case is that on 27.06.2024, the victim lady filed an FIR against the petitioners before the Officer-in-charge of Juria Police Station, inter-alia, alleging that on 16.07.2024 the accused No.1 named in the FIR namely, Ikbal Hussain took her from her house to a dhaba, on the pretext of getting court marriage with her and subjected her to sexual intercourse and took naked photos of her and threatened her to publish the same in social media.

¶4It is also alleged in the FIR that thereafter the accused No.1 took the victim to the house of other accused persons where the accused No.3 and 4 namely, Abdul Mijanur, and Sadiqul Islam also tried to do bad things with her. Page No.# 3/4

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the victim is a major girl of about 25 years of age.

¶6Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the victim girl, herself came to the house of the petitioner No.2 i.e. Abdul Hamid to get married with Ikbal Hussain and when he was not found in his residence, she lodged a false complaint against the petitioners.

¶7On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary of Moirabari P. S. Case No. 125/2024, and has submitted that in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, she has categorically stated that the petitioner No.1, Ikbal Hussain has subjected her to physical relationship and also made her photographs viral in the social media.

¶8However, against the other accused persons, she has only implicated her that the other accused persons have assaulted her.

¶9I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, and has gone through the case diary of Moirabari P. S. Case No. 125/2024.

¶10On perusal of the case diary, it appears that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner No.1, Ikbal Hussain, in the case diary, which does not justify grant of anticipatory bail under Section 183 BNSS to him at this date.

¶11Hence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner Ikbal Hussain is hereby rejected.

¶12However, as regards other three petitioners are concerned, considering the materials in the case diary, this Court is of considered opinion that their custodian detention may not be necessary if they otherwise cooperate in the investigation.

¶13So, in view of above, the above named petitioners, namely, (2) Abdul Hamid,

(3) Mijanul Haque @ Abdul Mijanur, and (4) Sadiqul Islam, are hereby directed to Page No.# 4/4 appear before the Investigating Officer of Moirabari P. S. Case No. 125/2024, within a period of 7 days from the date of this order and cooperate in the investigation. So, if they do so, within the stipulated period of time, in the event of their arrest, in connection with Moirabari P. S. Case No. 125/2024, they shall be allowed to go on bail of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only), each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority subject to the following conditions: i. That the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation. ii. That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who may be acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts of the case before the Investigating Officer.

¶14With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010177442024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2293/2024o IKBALoHUSSAINoANDo3oORS.o S/OoABDULoHAMIDo VILL-oSONAIBERAo P.S.oJURIAo DIST.oNAGAON,oASSAM 2:oABDULoHAMID oS/OoJAYNALoABEDINo VILL-oSONAIBERAo P.S.oJURIAo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAM 3:oMIJANULoHAQUEo@oABDULoMIJANUR oS/OoJAYNALoABEDINo VILL-oSONAIBERAo P.S.oJURIAo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAM 4:oSADIQULoISLAM oS/OoABDULoSALAMo VILL-oSONAIBERAo P.S.oJURIAo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM 2:MUSSTT.oSABIQUNoNAHAR oD/OoALALoUDDINo Page No.# 2/4 VILL- PACHIM MOIRABARI W/NO. 6 P.S. MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N UDDIN, MS. A AKHTAR,MR S K CHHETRY,MR. M ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA