VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Sajidur Rahman v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
1 September 2024
Bench
N. Unni Krishnan Nairauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2607/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 02.09.2024

Heard Mr. S. M. Mollah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P., Assam, appearing on behalf of the sole respondent.

This is an application for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in Hajo Police Station Case No. 295/2024 u/ss.81/318(2)/115(2)/351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Page No.# 2/3 The petitioner, herein, was arrested on 14th of August, 2024, has been under custody since then.

Considering the nature of allegations so levelled and the period of detention undergone; this Court is of the considered view that further custodial detention of the petitioner, herein, is not required in connection with Hajo Police Station Case No. 295/2024 u/ss.81/318(2)/115(2)/351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Accordingly, the petitioner, herein, shall be enlarged on regular bail in connection

with

Hajo

Police

Station

Case

No.

295/2024 u/ss.81/318(2)/115(2)/351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with a surety of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hajo, on the following terms and conditions, that :

(i) The petitioner shall appear before the I.O. of the case within 1(one) week from today. Thereafter, shall appear as and when so required by the I.O. for the purpose of investigation;

(ii) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation of the case;

(ii) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction without obtaining prior permission of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hajo; and

(iii) Page No.# 3/3

(iv) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Police Officer and/or tamper with the evidence of the case. With the above directions and observations, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010178322024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2607/2024 SAJIDUR RAHMAN S/O SARIFUDDIN RAHMAN, R/O KETEKIKUCHI LAOTOLI, P.S.-HAJO, DIST- KAMRUP (R), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S M MOLLAH, MR. D N AMIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.