VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Mridul Jyoti Deka v. Himani Talukdar

Dismissed On withdrawal no order for such liberty
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
6 August 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
Crl.Rev.P. 314/2023

Judgment

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010178462023

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./314/2023 MRIDUL JYOTI DEKA S/O LATE RAJANI KANTA DEKA R/O VILL-CHANDKUCHI P.S. NALBARI DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS HIMANI TALUKDAR D/O MADHAB TALUKDAR R/O VILL-PANIGAON (BHATTACHUPA) P.O. PANIGAON P.S. BELSOR DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM PIN-781034 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P UPADHYAY, MR A UPADHYAY Advocate for the Respondent : MS F BEGUM, MS P DASGUPTA,MR S PAUL

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK O R D E R

07.08.2024 Heard Mr. P. Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Paul, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent.

¶2Aggrieved with the impugned judgment and order dated 09.05.2023 Page No.# 2/2 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalbari in F.C. Case No.(125 Cr.P.C) 130/2021, whereby the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.4000/- (rupees four thousand) per month to the sole respondent towards maintenance allowance of their minor child from the date of passing of the said order dated 09.05.2023, the petitioner preferred this criminal revision petition on 10.08.2023.

¶3On instruction of the petitioner, his counsel Mr. P. Upadhyay is not pressing this criminal revision petition.

¶4Accordingly, this criminal revision petition stands dismissed, on being not pressed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.