VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Jiarul Hoque @ Jiarul Islam and Anr v. The State of Assam

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
29 September 2023
Bench
Mridul Kumar Kalitaauthor
Case no.
AB 2880/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 29.09.2023

¶1Heard Mr. M. U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶2This application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed by the petitioners, namely, (1) Jiarul Hoque @ Jiarul Islam, and

(2) Nasir Uddin, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhing P. S. Case No. 128/2023 under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3The gist of accusation against the present petitioners one Marjina Begum lodged an FIR on 01.08.2023 before the Officer-In-Charge of Dhing Police Station, naming five numbers of the accused in the FIR including the present petitioners, inter-alia, alleging that on 28.07.2023 at about 10.30 PM, as per the instructions of the present petitioners the other accused persons named in the FIR, assaulted the husband of the first informant. Thereafter, the husband of the informant was brought to the house of the informant and when the informant went to her mother's house, her husband was again tied with a rope around his neck and thereafter, he was hanged with a rope and on the next morning, the son of the first informant saw the husband of the first informant hanging with a rope.

¶4On receipt of the said FIR, Dhing P. S. Case No. 128/2023 was registered.

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is only that they have instructed the other accused person named in the FIR to assault the husband of the first informant however, it is submitted that the said allegation is false and there is no evidence in that Page No.# 3/4 regard.

¶6It is also submitted that as no allegation of assault directly by the present petitioners has been made by them in the FIR as they are the permanent resident under jurisdiction of Dhing Police Station, they shall co-operate in the investigation.

¶7On the other hand, Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced the case diary of the Dhing P. S. Case No. 128/2023 and has submitted that though there are evidence of witnesses that there was an altercation between the petitioners and the deceased and the present petitioners also slapped and assaulted the deceased. However, as regards the allegation of strangulating the husband of the first informant or as regards instigating the accused nos. 3, 4 and 5 by the present petitioners as of now there is no evidence on record to that effect in the case diary.

¶8Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties as well as considering the materials in the case diary, the petitioners, namely, (1) Jiarul Hoque @ Jiarul Islam, and (2) Nasir Uddin are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer of Dhing P. S. Case No. 128/2023 and co-operate in the investigation of the case within a period of ten (10) days from the date of this order and if they do so within the stipulated period of time, in the event of arrest in connection with Dhing P. S. Case No. 128/2023, the above named petitioners shall be allowed to go on bail of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority subject to the following conditions: i. That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to the first informant or any other person who is acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him from Page No.# 4/4 disclosing such facts to the Investigating Officer of the said case. ii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer of the Dhing P. S. Case No. 128/2023.

¶9With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

¶10Send back the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010178552023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2880/2023o JIARULoHOQUEo@oJIARULoISLAMoANDoANR.o S/OoNASIRoUDDIN,o VILL.-oDHUPGURIoPATHAR,oP.O.-oDHUPGURI,oP.S.-oDHING,oDIST.-oNAGAON,o ASSAM,oPIN-o782123. 2:oNASIRoUDDIN oS/OoSIRAJoUDDINo@oANAMAToULLAH o VILL.-oDHUPOGURIoPATHAR oP.O.-oDHUPGURI oP.S.-oDHING oDIST.-oNAGAON oASSAM oPIN-o782123o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REP.oBYoTHEoP.P.,oASSAM. AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oMoUoMAHMUDo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.