VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Diganta Tamuli v. The State of Assam

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
2 September 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2621/2024

Judgment

ORDER

03.09.2024

¶1Heard Mr. B. K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner Diganta Tamuli.

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since

13.08.2024 in connection with Dhemaji P.S. Case No. 148/2024 under Sections Page No.# 2/3 61(2)/305 of the BNSS read with Section 7 of the EC Act.

¶3Heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.

¶4The allegation against the petitioner is that he is the stockist and he was selling domestic/commercial LPG cylinders in his house premises. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been illegally selling domestic/commercial LPG cylinders in his house in the garb of a stockist.

¶5Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection stating that 22 full LPG cylinders, 2 empty cylinders and 23 commercial cylinders were found in his house. The offence alleged is of grave nature as 38 cylinders were found in his house.

¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner on the other hand, has submitted that the petitioner's wife Karishma Sonowal is an authorized distributing agent and Annexure-3 reflects the same.

¶7I have considered the submissions at the Bar that the petitioner has been behind bars since 13.08.2024. It appears that further custodial detention may not be required for progress of the investigation.

¶8Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Dhemaji, under the conditions that: Page No.# 3/3

(i) The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged,

(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer every fortnight till completion of investigation, and

(iii) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court till completion of the trial

¶9On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶10In terms of the above observation, bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010178722024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2621/2024 DIGANTA TAMULI S/O SOMESWAR TAMULI @ SUMESWAR TAMULI, R/O VILL- NAGAKHELIA, P.S.-DHEMAJI, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K GOGOI, C. DEKA,MR. B BISHAYA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.