Hussain Ahmad v. Muzahidul Alom and 3 Ors

ORDER

21.10.2024

Heard Mr. M. Shelim, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 3 & 4.

¶2Despite call, none has appeared for the opposite party no. 1-writ petitioner and the opposite party no. 2.

¶3The instant interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant seeking correction of his name from 'Hussain Ali' to 'Hussain Ahmad' and correction of his father's name from 'Mozibor Rahman' to 'Md. Abdus Salam'.

¶4The applicant had earlier preferred an interlocutory application, I.A.[C] no. 2221/2021 in the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 5527/2019 seeking his impleadment as party-respondent no. 4. In the said interlocutory application, he mentioned his details as under :-

"Hussain Ahmed, Age 26 years, S/o Mozibor Rahman, Village & P.O. Langla, P.S. Kalgachia, District – Barpeta, Assam"

¶5The said interlocutory application, I.A.[C] no. 2221/2021 was allowed by an Order dated

22.12.2021 and paragraph 6 thereof read as under :-

¶6Accordingly, the prayer for impleadment of the applicant – Page No.# 3/4

"Hussain Ali, Age – 26 S/o Mozibor Rahman, Village & P.O. Langla, P.S. Kalgachia, District – Barpeta, Assam"

as a party-respondent no. 4 is allowed.

¶6In the instant interlocutory application, it has been averred that in the interlocutory application, I.A.[C] no. 2221/2021, the name of the applicant's father was inadvertently mentioned as 'Mozibor Rahman' instead of 'Md. Abdus Salam'. Mr. Shelim, learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that an inadvertent typographical error was also crept in the interlocutory application, I.A.[C] no. 2221/2021 as the name of the applicant should have been mentioned as 'Hussain Ahmad', instead of 'Hussain Ahmed'.

¶7Mr. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 3 & 4 has submitted that as the mistakes in the name of the applicant and the name of the father of the applicant appear to be inadvertent ones, he has no objection if the instant interlocutory application is allowed.

¶8On perusal, it is found that the name of the applicant which was mentioned as 'Hussain Ali' in the Order dated 22.12.2021, was an inadvertent typographical mistake. It has been averred by the applicant that due to inadvertent mistake, he mentioned the name of his father as 'Mozibor Rahman' instead of 'Md. Abdus Salam'.

¶9As the mistakes appear to be typographical and inadvertent ones, the instant interlocutory application stands allowed with the observation that the details of the party-respondent no. 4 in the cause-title of the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 5527/2019 should be as under :-

"Hussain Ahmad, Age 26 years, S/o Md. Abdus Salam, Village & P.O. Langla, P.S. Kalgachia, District – Barpeta, Assam"

Page No.# 4/4

¶10The instant interlocutory application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010183242024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2756/2024o HUSSAINoAHMADo S/OoMD.oABDUSoSALAM,oVILLoANDoP.O.-LANGLA,oP.S.-KALGACHIA,oDIST- BARPETA,oASSAM VERSUSo MUZAHIDULoALOMoANDo3oORS.o S/OoANOWARoHOSSAIN,oVILL-oCHENIMARI,oP.O.-LANGLA,oP.S.- KALGACHIA,oDIST-oBARPETA,oASSAM 2:THEoUNIONoOFoINDIA oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoINDIA oMINISTRYoOFoPETROLEUMoANDoNATURALoGAS oA-WING oSHASTRIoBHAWAN oNEWoDELHI-110001 3:BHARAToPETROLEUMoCORPORATIONoLTD oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCHAIRMAN oBHARAToBHAVAN o5oANDo6oCURRIMBHOYoROAD oBALLARDoESTATE oPOSToBOXoNO.o688 oMUMBAI oMAHARASTRA-400001 4:TERRITORIALoMANAGER oBPCL o1SToFLOOR oNEXIAoPARK oGMCoHOSTELoROAD oCHRISTIANBASTI Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MR M SHELIM Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K KALITA, MR. S BARTHAKUR,MR H GUPTA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY