- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 1 December 2023
- Bench
- Sanjay Kumar Medhi
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 2620/2023
Judgment
ORDER
01.12.2023 Heard Ms. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicants, who by means Page No.# 3/4 of this application are seeking impleadment in the connected WP(C)/3291/2023.
¶2The cause of action in this writ petition is a closure of IMFL "ON" Shop of the writ petitioner. The said closure as per the writ petition is upon some verbal orders by the Excise Authority based upon the complaints lodged.
¶3It is submitted by Ms. Choudhury, learned counsel that it is the applicants, who had lodged the complaints and therefore, they may be given an opportunity of hearing.
¶4Shri S. Nandi, learned counsel for the opposite party / writ petitioner has however objected to the prayer for impleadment
¶5Also heard Shri D. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Excise Department.
¶6In paragraph 8 of the writ petition, a specific averment has been made that it is on the complaint of the applicants that the impugned action has been taken. For ready reference, the averments made in paragraph 8 is extracted hereinbelow- "That accordingly, the petitioner started renovating this existing restaurant for the opening of the bar and alongside also started the registration process of his license under Assam Excise Portal for issuance of permit / transport pass for lifting of IMFL at 'Tonique Restaurant & Bar'. In the meantime, a local Gurdwara viz. Sri Guru Singh Sabha and a local school under the name and style Parsuram Mazumdar Girl's High School came to know about the opening of the IMFL "ON" Shop and immediately started protesting it on the ground that it was close to educational institution and place of worship etc. They were also joined by Lanka Sikh Sachatan Nagarik Manch whereby they started threatening the petitioner and started noisy Page No.# 4/4 demonstration in front of the petitioner's Restaurant & Bar. They have also submitted various written complaints to the Deputy Commissioner along with Superintendent of Excise and Deputy Superintendent of Excise, Lanka."
¶7This Court is of the opinion that by the present application, the applicants are only seeking a scope of being heard at the adjudication of the writ petition which is an outcome of the complaints lodged by the applicants.
¶8In view of the above, the I.A. stands allowed and the applicants, namely, The 'Lanka Gurdwara Prabhandak Committee', Lanka, District – Nagaon represented by its President, Shri Dilip Singh, Ward No. 4, Lanka Town, PO & PS – Lanka, District – Hojai and The 'Lanka Sachetan Sikh Nagarik Mancha' represented by its Secretary, Shri Ranjit Singh, Ward No. 4, Lanka Town, Railway Station Road, PO & PS – Lanka, District – Hojai are impleaded as party respondent nos. 8 and 9. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010183962023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2620/2023o in WP(C)/3291/2023 THEoLANKAoGURDWARAoPRABHANDAKoCOMMITTEEoANDoANR.o LANKA,oDISTRICToNAGAON,oASSAM,oREPRESENTEDoBYoITSoPRESIDENT,o SRIoDILIPoSINGH,oS/OoSANTAoSINGH,oWARDoNO.4,oLANKAoTOWN,oP.OoANDo P.S.oLANKA,oDISTRICToHOJAI,oASSAM. 2:oTHEoLANKAoSACHETANoSIKHoNAGARIKoMANCHA oREPRESENTEDoBYoITSoSECRETARYoSRIoRANJIToSINGH oS/OoLATEoSATYANARAYANoSINGH oWARDoNO.o4 oLANKAoTOWN oRAILWAYoSTATIONoROAD oP.O.oANDoP.S.oLANKA oDIST.oHOJAI oASSAo VERSUSo SUBIRoCHAKRABORTYoANDo7oORS.o S/O-oSURENDRAoKANTAoCHAKRABORTYoR/O-oWARDoNO.o4,oGOBINDAo NAGAR,oP.O.oANDoP.S.-oLANKA,oDISTRICT-oHOJAI,oASSAM-o782446.o PROPRIETORoOFo-oTONIQUEoRESTAURANToANDoBAR,oBAR-CUM- RESTAURANTo(IMFLoONoSHOP),oGOBINDAoNAGAR,oSTATIONoROAD,o LANKAoTOWN,oUNDERoSUB-DIVISIONoHOJAIoDISTRICT-oNAGAONo (ASSAM). 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oEXCISEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 4:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (EXCISE) SUB-DIVISION- HOJAI NAGAON ASSAM. 5:THE SUPERINTENDNT OF EXCISE NAGAON ASSAM. 6:THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT (EXCISE) SUB-DIVISION- HOJAI NAGAON ASSAM. 7:THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE LANKA SUB-DIVISION- HOJAI NAGAON ASSAM. 8:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT- NAGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS S A KHALIFA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B D KONWAR SR. ADV. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.