Sumit Dey v. The Union of India and 4 Ors

ORDER

18.11.2024 Heard Mr. B.K. Sen, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Mitra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3-5. Mr. K. Gogoi, learned CGC appears for the respondent No.1. Mr. B.K. Sen, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition the relief sought for has already been granted by the respondent Company and accordingly, submits that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010203382022 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1749/2021 SUMIToDEY S/OoSRIoTUSHARoKANTIoDEYo WORKINGoASoDEPUTYoMANAGER oFIREoANDoSAFETYoDEPARTMENT oBRAHMAPUTRAoCRACKERoANDoPOLYMERoLIMITED oLEPETKATA oPOoDIBRUGARH o786004oDISToDIBRUGARH o786004oASSAM oVERSUS THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo4oORS REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA MINISTRYoOFoOILoANDoNATURALoGAS MEWoDELHIo110001 2:THEoSECRETARY TOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA oMINISTRYoOFoOILoANDoNATURALoGASo oNEWoDELHIo110001 o3:BRAHMAPUTRAoCRACKERoANDoPOLYMERoLIMITED AoGOVT.oOFoINDIA UNDERTAKINGoUNDERoTHEoMINISTRYoOFoOILoANDoNATURALoGASoANDoISo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoMANAGINGoDIRECTORoOFoBRAHMAPUTRAo CRACKERoANDoPOLYMERoLIMITED oLEPETKATA oDIBRUGARH oASSAMo786004 o4:THEoCHIEFoGENERALoMANAGER Page No.# 2/2 BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED LEPETKATA PO DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786004 5:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER HUMAN RESOURCE DEPT. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED LEPETKATA DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786004 ------------ Advocate for : MR. N DHAR Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI