- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 23 April 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 2548/2023
Judgment
ORDER
24.04.2024
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condoning the delay of 39 days in preferring the accompanying appeal against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2023 passed in Title Appeal No.23/2019. This Court had duly taken note of the grounds and reasons which have been stated in the instant application, more particularly, in paragraphs 4 to 8.
¶2The said grounds and reasons, in the opinion of this Court are sufficient to condone the delay in preferring the accompanying appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 39 days is condoned.
¶3Registry is directed to register the accompanying regular second appeal and list the matter under the column of Order XLI Rule 11 of the CPC.
¶4A copy of the Memo of Appeal be served upon Mr. A Bhatra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent during the course of the day.
¶5Interlocutory application, accordingly, stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010187982023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/2548/2023o ONoTHEoDEATHoOFoLATEoMAHIDGARoDEKAoHISoHEIRSo,SUBHADRAoDEKAo ANDo4oORS.o W/OoLATEoMAHIDHARoDEKA,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA,oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG,oPSo GHAGRAPUR,oDISToNALBARI,oASSAM 2:oSRIoNARENoDEKA oS/OoLATEoMAHIDHARoDEKA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAM 3:oSRIoKARUNAoDEKA oS/OoLATEoMAHIDHARoDEKA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAM 4:oSMTIoJOYMATIoDEKA oD/OoLATEoMAHIDHARoDEKA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAM 5:oSMTIoJURIoDEKA PageoNo.#o2/3 oD/OoLATEoMAHIDHARoDEKA o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAo VERSUSo BIPULoDEKAoANDo4oORS.o S/OoLATEoAMRIToDEKA,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA,oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG,oPSo GHAGRAPUR,oDISToNALBARI,oASSAM 2:SRIoBARNALIoDEKA oS/OoLATEoBHADRAoDEKAo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAM 3:SRIoBINAYoDEKA oS/OoSRIoBHABESHoDEKAo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAM 4:SRIoSANJAYoDEKA oS/OoLATEoAMBIKAoDEKAo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAM 5:SRIoCHARANoDEKA oS/OoLATEoAMBIKAoDEKAo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoNO.o1oBARDHANARA oMOUZAoPUBoBARBHAG oPSoGHAGRAPUR oDISToNALBARI oASSAo Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the applicant(s): Ms. S Diffusa Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. A Bhatra B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.