VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Gulzar Hussain and 3 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
14 March 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 2967/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 15-03-2024

¶1Heard Mr. H. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2The petitioners, namely, [1] Gulzar Hussain [2] Chafikul Islam [3] Mofidul Islam and [4] Rafikul Islam have filed this application u/s 438 Cr.PC with prayer of pre-arrest bail as they are apprehending arrest in connection with Nagaon P.S. Case No. 69/2023 registered u/s 147/148/149/325/326/307 of IPC.

¶3Heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Addl. PP, Assam.

¶4The allegation against the petitioners is that on 26.01.2023 at about 12 PM a meeting was held in the residence of the informant to discuss about public road. After the meeting was over the petitioners armed with sharp weapons and other weapons assaulted the aggrieved and the injured persons who were also present in the meeting causing grievous injuries especially, causing grievous injuries on Jiwaur Rahman.

¶5Seen the Medico Legal Report which reflects that the injured person sustained grievous injuries caused by sharp weapon.

¶5I have considered the submissions at the Bar. It is submitted at the Bar that there was an altercation between both the sides. Another case being Nagaon P.S. Case No. 70/2023 was registered against the aggrieved as well as Page No.# 3/3 the informant and charge-sheet has already been laid against them. It is also submitted at the Bar that there was a group clash between both the parties. I have considered the submissions that the petitioners who were on interim bail have appeared before the IO and they have co-operated with the investigation. The petitioners have also pledged to co-operate with the remaining part of the investigation. They are local residents. I have considered the submission that custodial interrogation may not be required for further investigation. Investigation has also progressed to a considerable extent.

¶6Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, the interim order dated 29.08.2023 is hereby made absolute under the conditions that:- i. The petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged; and ii. the petitioners shall appear before the I.O. after every 15 days till completion of investigation. Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010188142023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2967/2023o GULZARoHUSSAINoANDo3oORS.o S/OoDULALoUDDIN,o VILL.-oSHILLONGNOI,oP.S.-oNAGAONoSADAR,oDIST.-oNAGAON,oASSAM. 2:oCHAFIKULoISLAM oS/OoSBABAJEoALI o VILL.-oNARAMARI oP.S.-oNAGAONoSADAR oDIST.-oNAGAON oASSAM. 3:oMOFIDULoISLAM oS/OoSBABAJEoALI o VILL.-oSHILLONGNOI oP.S.-oNAGAONoSADAR oDIST.-oNAGAON oASSAM. 4:oRAFIKULoISLAM oS/OoSBABAJEoALI o VILL.-oSHILLONGNOI oP.S.-oNAGAONoSADAR oDIST.-oNAGAON oASSAMo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo TOoBEoREP.oBYoTHEoP.P.,oASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR I A HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.