- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 September 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 2800/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 01.10.2024
Heard Ms. M.R. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3
¶2By this application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, the accused petitioner namely, Manichandra Singha, has prayed for bail in connection with Hojai P.S. Case No. 260/2024 under Section 318(4)/316(5) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 21(3)/22/23/26 of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019.
¶3According to the FIR, the petitioner used a trading app known as the YBY trading app, which deals in unregulated deposits without adhering to the guidelines set by the RBI. The allegation against the petitioner is that he collected money from individuals with the assurance of significant financial returns; however, he subsequently failed to return the money.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been detained in custody since 03.09.2024. The petitioner is a businessman by profession. Considering the fact as well as the length of detention, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
¶5On the other hand, Mr. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary and submits that seven witnesses were examined till date and they have implicated the petitioner in the instant case. The petitioner had collected money from people with assurance to return with high interest but he did not return the money. Considering the nature of the offence, he has opposed in granting bail to the petitioner.
¶6I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. I have also perused the case diary.
¶7Considering the materials available in the case diary till date as well Page No.# 3/3 as the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected.
¶8The bail application stands disposed of.
¶9Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010191212024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2800/2024 MANICHANDRA SINGHA S/O LATE CHANDRA DEV SINGHA R/O BISHNUPUR, P.S. HOJAI, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M R DEVI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.