VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Rafizul Ali v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
5 March 2024
Bench
Kaushik Goswamiauthor
Case no.
AB 3040/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 06-03-2024 Heard Mr. A.R. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P., Assam, appearing for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Page No.# 2/3 Procedure, 1973, praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, i.e. Rafizul Ali, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Ratabari P.S. Case No. 50/2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 384/2023 registered under section 420/406/409/34 of IPC. The case diary as called for and is placed before this Court. It may be mentioned that by order dated 08.09.2023, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the conditions. Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P submits that the case diary shows that the petitioner appeared before the Investigating Officer and got his statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C as per interim per-arrest bail granted earlier. He further submits that it appears that the inquiry report shows that the same allegations as made in the earlier two FIRs involving the non implementation of scheme sanctioned by the Government of Assam, was made in the present FIR. It appears that the petitioner is being subjected to double jeopardy on the same allegations. It further appears that he was arrested and put in jail custody for 90 days in connection with first FIR then in the next case i.e Ratabari P.S. Case No. 283/2022, he was granted pre-arrest bail. As such, this Court finds that custodial interrogation may not be required in the interest of the ongoing investigation of this case. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order dated

08.09.2023 is hereby made absolute subject to the following conditions:

¶1That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when so required. Page No.# 3/3

¶2The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to the informant or to any other persons who may be acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from deposing against the petitioner in the pending investigation. Return the case diary. In terms of above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010192202023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3040/2023 RAFIZUL ALI S/O LATE NIMAR ALI VILL- GULALKANDI P.O. BAZARGHAT P.S. RATABARI DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM PIN-788735 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.