- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 September 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 2804/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 17 .09. 2024 Heard Mr. Ditul Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner, namely Insaf Ali, praying for regular bail, who was arrested on
23.08.2024 in connection with Gorchuk P.S. Case No. 199/2024 Page No.# 2/3 (Corresponding to G. R. Case No. 3903/2024) under Sections 303(2)/ 317(2) of BNS, 2023 read with Sections 21(b)/ 27/ 29/ 20(b)(ii)B/ 22a of the NDPS Act, 1985. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been detained in custody since 23.08.2024 and since then he has bas been in judicial custody for last 47 days. No any contraband has been recovered from his possession and the petitioner has been arrested purely on suspicion. The co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail and hence considering the length of detention, the petitioner may be released on bail. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that considering the length of detention, the prayer for bail may be considered. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the natter in its entirety and the period of detention, the petition is allowed. Hence, it is directed that the petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) with 2 (two) suitable sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati in connection with the aforementioned case. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioner:
(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Kamrup (M), Guwahati without prior written permission from him/ her;
(b) shall not hamper in the investigation and tamper with the evidence of the case; and Page No.# 3/3
(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010192792024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2804/2024 INSAF ALI S/O- LATE MUHIBUR RAHMAN, R/O- DHOLAITOLA, P.S- HAJO, DIST-KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DITUL DAS, D R TALUKDAR,MR. B R DAS,MR. K MEDHI,MR. A K TALUKDAR,MS TINLUNG Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.