VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Akshendra Patgiri and 4 Ors v. The State of Assam and 4 Ors

Closed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
12 September 2023
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 423/2021

Judgment

ORDER Date : 12/09/2023

Heard Mr. I. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate representing respondent No.1 and Mr. C. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent No.5. Page No.# 3/4

¶2This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, who were praying for a direction to the Court for appointment for the petitioners against the posts in which they were selected by a Selection Committee within a reasonable period of time. The petitioners had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.

(C)/1424/2011. The said writ petition was preferred by the present writ petitioners along with other similarly situated persons as petitioners praying for a direction for their appointment in Grade III and Grade IV posts in the category of persons with disability. All the petitioners belong to the category of PWD.

¶3This Court by order dated 23.04.2015 disposed of the earlier writ petition being W.P.(C).1424/2011 along with W.P.(C)/3994/2011 with the following directions:- " In this case what transpires is that a recruitment drive was carried out in the year 2005-06 to fill up 662 backlog vacancies in Gr-III and IV. These vacancies therefore obviously pertained to previous years i.e, prior to the year 2005-06. Even in this drive, 134 of the backlog vacancies could not be filled up. It appears that since the year 2005-06 no review has been carried out by the State regarding identification of posts earmarked to be filled up by persons with disability or to update the list so prepared. In such circumstances, when admittedly petitioners could not be appointed because of anomalies in the selection process particularly at the time of preparation of state level select list, Court is of the view that it would meet the ends of justice if a direction is issued to the respondents to appoint the petitioners in the available vacancies relatable to the recruitment drive carried out in the year 2005-06. Naturally, these vacancies are available in the different departments, the list of which is available with the Social Welfare Department. Ordered accordingly. Keeping in view the mandate of the Persons with Disabilities Act, all the concerned administrative departments shall cooperate with the Social Welfare Department in ensuring that petitioners are suitably accommodated against the indentified posts in the respective departments. The Social Welfare Department being the nodal department shall verify the position of the petitioners vis a vis the selection process and proceed with their appointment in terms of their position. Let the above exercise be carried out within a period of 4 (four) months Page No.# 4/4 from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Both the writ petitions are accordingly allowed. No cost".

¶4Pursuant thereto since the order was not complied with, a contempt petition being Cont.Cas(C)/582/2017 was filed, which is presently pending. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking compliance of this earlier order dated 23.04.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.(C).1424/2011 and W.P.(C)/3994/2011.

¶5It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in the meantime petitioner No.2, namely, Md. Abed Ali has since been appointed. However, the petitioner Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 have not yet been appointed.

¶6After arguing for sometime Mr. I. Alam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since there is already an order passed earlier by this Court vide order dated 23.04.2015 in W.P.(C).1424/2011 and W.P.(C)/3994/2011 and a contempt petition is also pending, learned counsel does not wish to press the present writ petition any further and seeks to withdraw the same. Taking his submissions on record, the present writ petition being W.P.(C)/423/2021 stands closed as not pressed.

¶7Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010193082020 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/423/2021o AKSHENDRAoPATGIRIoANDo4oORSo S/O-oBIRENoPATGIRI,oVILL-oODALGURI,oDIST.-oBARPETA,oASSAM,oPIN-o 784509 2:oMD.oABEDoALI oC/O-oBABJANoALI oVILL-oCHOWRAKARA oP.S.oSONESWAR oDIST.-oKAMRUP oASSAM oPIN-o781382 3:oMD.oAKANoALI oC/O-oMD.oTOMIZoALI oVILL.oANDoP.O.oKANIHA oDIST.-oKAMRUP oASSAM oPIN-o781380 4:oBEAUTIoPATAR oD/O-oLT.oREHASWARoPATAR oVILL-oKAHIBARI oP.O.oCHARAIBAHI oDIST.-oMORIGAON oASSAM oPIN-o782103 5:oSYEDoSAYEDoALI oC/O-oHASIMoALI oVILL-oJAHARoGAON oP.O.oPASCHIMoJAHARoGAON oDIST.-oBAKSA oBTAD oASSAM Page No.# 2/4 PIN- 78132 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6 3:THE COMM. AND SECY. PERSONAL (B) DEPTT. GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GHY 4:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. ASSAM UZANBAZAR GHY-1 KAMRUP (M) 5:THE STATE COMMISSIONER OF DISABILITIES GOVT. OF ASSAM BASISTHA GHY KAMRUP (M Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I ALAM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.