VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Dilbar Hussain and 2 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
8 September 2023
Bench
Arun Dev Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 3043/2023

Judgment

Order

08.09.2023

¶1This is an application made under Section 439 Cr. P.C. seeking bail by the accused/petitioners, namely, (1) Dilbar Hussain, (2) Sad Akkash Ali and (3) Azim Uddin Ahmed, who were arrested on 12.08.2023 in connection with Barpeta Road P.S. Case No. 115/2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1154/2023 being registered under Section 394 of IPC.

¶2Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam who produced the Case Diary.

¶3The petitioners were arrested on 12.08.2023 and they are behind bar for last 26 days.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Investigation is almost over and statement of accused has thoroughly been interrogated by the investigating agency. There is no legal evidence against the present petitioners to connect them with the alleged offence. The learned Counsel further submits that the petitioners are in custody since 12.08.2023 and the Page No.# 3/4 conclusion of trial will take sufficient time. On the aforesaid grounds, prayer is made to release the petitioners on bail.

¶5Learned Additional Public prosecutor for the State has seriously opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

¶6Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and on a perusal of the material available on record including the case diary and also the advance stage of investigation and period of detention, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that no further custodial interrogation/detention is required. Accordingly, the present application is allowed.

¶7It is directed that the petitioners, name above, be released on bail in connection with the case aforementioned, on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta, with the following conditions:-

(a) Shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta, without prior written permission from him;

(b) Shall not hamper with the investigation of the case and tamper with the evidence of the case;

(c) Shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office. Page No.# 4/4 In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010193102023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3043/2023 DILBAR HUSSAIN AND 2 ORS. S/O LATE FEDDUS ALI, VILL.- KORAGARI GAON, P.S.- BARPETA, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM. 2: SAD AKKASH ALI S/O IBRAHIM ALI VILL.- KORAGARI GAON P.S.- BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM. 3: AZIM UDDIN AHMED S/O SONAR UDDIN AHMED VILL.- BARUA PATHER (BOKO) P.S.- BOKO DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE P.P., ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.