- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 23 September 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- Crl.Pet. 1182/2024
Judgment
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010196832024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1182/2024 VIKASH MITTAL S/O LATE BHIM RAJ MANDHANIA R/O GOPAL KUNJ, R.G. CENTRE, 4TH FLOOR, FLAT NO. 4D, D.M. LOHIA ROAD, P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786125 VERSUS SUNIL VIJAYA S/O LATE KRISHNA KUMAR VIJAYA R/O GOKULDHAM, PARBOTIA ROAD, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MR. R K MAHANTA,MR. R S MISHRA Advocate for the Respondent : ,
:: BEFORE :: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R
24.09.2024
Heard Mr. A.K. Gupta, the learned counsel representing the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Page No.# 2/2
¶2This is an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 read with Section 438 of the said Code challenging the order dated 17.08.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia in Criminal Appeal No.15(3)/2024.
¶3The present petitioner was convicted under Section 148 of the N.I. Act. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and was directed to pay a fine of ₹45,000,00/- with default stipulations.
¶4Thereafter, the petitioner filed an appeal being Criminal Appeal No.15(3)/2024 before the Sessions Court at Tinsukia. The petitioner prayed for suspension of the sentence.
¶5The appellate court in its order dated 17.08.2024 held that the learned counsel for the appellant did not make any submission regarding financial hardship of the appellant. Therefore, the prayer for suspension of sentence and for releasing the appellant on bail was rejected.
¶6I have considered the submissions made by Mr. Gupta in the light of the materials available with the record.
¶7Without making any deliberate discussions, this Court hereby directs that the sentence imposed upon the present petitioner by the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tinsukia in N.I. Case No.113/2021 shall remain suspended till disposal of the appeal. The direction asking the petitioner to deposit 20% of the fine amount shall also remain suspended.
¶8The Sessions Judge, Tinsukia is directed to dispose of the appeal within next 3(three) months of receiving this order. With the aforesaid direction, the Criminal Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.