VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Dhruba Jyoti Saikia v. Union of India and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
8 September 2023
Bench
Devashis Baruahauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 5181/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 08.09.2023

¶1The instant writ petition is filed challenging the order bearing No.ZA180223062682M dated 28.02.2023 passed by the Respondent No.4 cancelling the GST Registration of the Petitioner.

¶2The facts as could be discerned from a perusal of the writ petition are that the Petitioner herein was granted a registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and was issued a certificate of 24.05.2018. However, as stated in the writ petition that on account of acute financial hardship, the Petitioner could not file his return. A Show Cause notice was issued on

15.01.2023 by the Respondent No.4 asking the Petitioner to Show Cause as to why his registration should not be cancelled for not filing the returns under Section 39 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the said Show Cause notice, it was also mentioned that the Registration of the Petitioner was suspended w.e.f. 15.01.2023. It is not known as to what Show Cause reply the Petitioner has filed as the said reply to the Show Cause notice is not a part of the records.

¶3Be that as it may, on 28.02.2023, the Respondent No.4 cancelled the registration on the ground "Registration is cancelled". It is also seen from the records that the Petitioner claims that he had filed his returns thereafter in terms with Section 39 of the CGST Act, 2017. Thereupon, the instant writ Page No.# 3/4 petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the order of cancellation dated 28.02.2023.

¶4I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and also perused the materials on record.

¶5A perusal of the impugned order dated 28.02.2023 would show that the said order is passed by a quasi judicial authority. The effect of the said order would be that in absence of a registration, the Petitioner cannot carry out his business. Therefore, the effect of the said impugned order would entail civil consequences.

¶6In the backdrop of the said, if this Court peruses the order, it is shocking that the Respondent No.4 had cancelled the registration by giving a reason that the "Registration is cancelled". This clearly shows a total non-application of mind apart from the fact that the impugned order is devoid of any justifiable reasons. Accordingly, this Court therefore sets aside the said impugned order dated

28.02.2023 thereby restoring the status back to the date on which the Show Cause notice dated 15.01.2023 was issued.

¶7The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that in the meantime, the Petitioner had already filed his returns. This aspect of the matter can very well be taken note of by the Respondent No.4 for which liberty is given to the Petitioner to file an additional reply to the said Show Cause notice bringing to the notice of the Respondent No.4 about the filing of the returns as well as any other grounds which the Petitioner deems fit and proper. The said exercise be done within a period of 10 (ten) days from today and thereupon, the Respondent No.4 shall take due steps in accordance with law.

¶8Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of in terms with the Page No.# 4/4 observations and directions made hereinabove.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010197302023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5181/2023o DHRUBAoJYOTIoSAIKIAo S/O-oLATEoKIRONoCH.oSAIKIA,oR/O-oB.P.oCHALIHAoPATH,oP.O.,oP.S.oANDoDIST. SIVASAGAR,oASSAM,oPIN-o785640. VERSUSo UNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo3oORS.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoINDIA,o DEPARTMENToOFoFINANCE. 2:THEoPRINCIPALoCOMMISSIONERoOFoCENTRALoGOODSoANDoSERVICEo TAX oGSToBHAWAN oKEDARoROAD oGUWAHATI-781001 oASSAM 3:THEoASSISTANToCOMMISSIONER oCENTRALoGOODSoANDoSERVICEoTAX oDIBRUGARHoDIVISION oDIBRUGARH. 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENT oCENTRALoGOODSoANDoSERVICEoTAX oSIVASAGAR oRANGE-2 oDIST.oSIVASAGAR oASSAo Page No.# 2/4 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. S. Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. C. Keyal, SC, GST BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.