- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 December 2023
- Bench
- Suman Shyam
- Case no.
- WP(C) 5332/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 11/12/2023
Heard Mr. M.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the writ petitioners. Also heard Mr. R.R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, PHE Department, Assam as well as Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing for the official respondents. The 4 (four) writ petitioners herein took part in the selection process for recruitment in the post of Technical Officer (TO-I) under the Dhubri PHE Division. After the conclusion of the selection process, a select list was prepared and published on 09/06/2023 recommending the name of 5 (five) candidates for appointment in the posts of TO-I. The names of the writ petitioners also find place in the list of the five selected candidates prepared in order of merit. The petitioners were expecting orders of appointments, to be issued by the authorities in their favour. However, when no such step was taken, the petitioners had submitted representation before the Executive Engineer, PHE Department, Dhubri, ventilating their grievance in the matter. Since the said representation has also failed to evoke any response, the petitioners have been compelled to approach this court by filing the instant writ petition. Mr. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, PHE, submits that the petitioners are amongst the five selected candidates but after the publication of the select list, some complaints were received from the participants with a request to conduct re-interview. At that stage, this writ petition came to be instituted, as a result of which, the entire matter has been put to a halt. If the petitioners are amongst the five selected candidates, than it is obvious that they would entertain a legitimate expectation to be appointed in the post for which they have been selected. Page No.# 4/4 Having conducted the selection process, the authorities cannot refuse to issue the order of appointment unless the selection process itself is cancelled for reasons, which are very strong and compelling and can be established on the face of the records. No such reason has been cited before this Court during the course of the hearing of the case nor is there any decision to cancel the selection process. In view of the above, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction upon the respondents to examine the representation submitted by the petitioners. Upon such examination, appropriate step be taken in the matter, as may be found fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case. The aforesaid process be completed within 45 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Whatever be the outcome of the process, the same be communicated to the petitioners in writing. If the petitioners continue to remain aggrieved even thereafter, they would be at liberty to approach this Court once again. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
sukhamay Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010197492023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5332/2023o JAHANGIRoALOMoANDo3oORSo S/O-oSAHIDURoRAHMAN,oVILLAGEoANDoP.O.oDAFARPUR,oP.S.oTAMARHAT,o DISTRICT-oDHUBRI,oASSAM,oPIN-o783334 2:oSHAHRUKHoAHMED oS/O-oJAHANoUDDINoAHMED oR/O-oBILASHIPARAoWARDoNO.2 oSURJYAKHATA oP.O.oANDoP.S.oBILASHIPARA oDISTRICT-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-o783348 3:oHUSSAINoMOHAMMADoRAMEEZoRAJA oS/O-oAFZALoHUSSAIN oVILLAGE-oJHAGRAPARoPART-III oP.O.oJHAGRARPAR oP.S.oDHUBRI oDISTRICT-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-o783325 4:oMIRZAoSUMSUDDIN oS/O-oABDULoBAREQUE oVILL-oBIDYAPARAoPART-II oP.O.oKHALILPUR oP.S.oDHUBRI oDISTRICT-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-o78332o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo5oORSo PageoNo.#o2/4 REPRESENTEDoBYoITSoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAMoPHEoDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-06 2:THEoCHIEFoENGINEERoPHE o(PRIMARYoHEALTHoENGINEERING)oDEPARTMENT oHENGRABARI oDISTRICT-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM oGUWAHATI-o36 3:THEoEXECUTIVEoENGINEERo(PHE) oDHUBRIoDIVISION oP.O.oANDoP.S.oDHUBRI oDIST.-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-o783301 4:THEoSELECTIONoCOMMITTEE oCONSTITUTEDoFORoTHEoPURPOSEoOFoTECHNICALoOFFICER-IoANDo TECHNICALoOFFICER-IIoINoPURSUANCEoOFoADVERTISEMENToNO.o PHEE/DBB/JJM/TC-203/2023-24oUNDERoDHUBRIoPHEoDIVISIONo REPRESENTEDoBYoITSoMEMBERoSECRETARY-CUM-EXECUTIVEoENGINEER (PHE) oDHUBRIoDIVISION oGTBoROAD oP.O.oANDoP.S.oDHUBRI oDIST.-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-o783301 5:THEoINTERVIEWoBOARD oCONSTITUTEDoFORoTAKINGoVIVA-VOCEoFORoTHEoPOSTSoOFoTECHNICALo OFFICER-Io(T.O.-I)oANDoTECHNICALoOFFICER-IIoUNDERoPHEoDHUBRIo DIVISION oDHUBRIoINoPURSUANCEoOFoADVERTISEMENToNO.oPHEE/DBB/JJM/TC- 203/2023-24oUNDERoDHUBRIoPHEoDIVISIONoREPRESENTEDoBYoITSo MEMBERoSECRETARY-CUM-EXECUTIVEoENGINEERo(PHE) oDHUBRIoDIVISION oGTBoROAD oP.O.oANDoP.S.oDHUBRI oDIST.-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-o783301 6:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oDHUBRI oP.O.oANDoP.S.oDHUBRI oDIST.-oDHUBRI Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM PIN- 78330 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.