VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Jahangir Alom v. The State of Assam and Anr

Rejected
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
28 October 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
FA(OS) 2933/2024

Judgment

ORDER 29-10-2024 Heard Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. Also heard Ms. P. Das, learned Amicus Curiae for the informant/respondent No.2. 2) The petitioner, namely, Jahangir Alom, son of Abdul Khaleque, resident of village Latibari Part-II under Abhayapuri Police Station of District Bongaigaon by this application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 are seeking bail in Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 209/2024 registered under Sections 75/140(3)/62 of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012, corresponding to MGR No. 391/2024, in which he was arrested on 02.09.2024 and is in custody since then. 3) As per the FIR dated 02.09.2024 lodged by the informant/ complainant/respondent No.2 before the Officer-in-Charge of Abhayapuri Police Station the case is that, since last 15 days her minor daughter was constantly disturbed by one person named Alam, who belongs to Islam religion and being a married man, tried to induce her said minor daughter putting her in a web of love affair. When her minor daughter goes to school, the said accused, who work as a Mistry in her school, used to give her indecent indications and thereby, used to disturb her. On the previous night around 07:00 pm when her minor daughter went to the shop to buy some food articles for the home, the said accused Alam with two of his friends forcefully tried to kidnap her minor daughter during which her minor daughter who save herself made hue and cry, pursuant to which local people arrived at the place of occurrence and apprehended the three accused persons red handed and also manhandled them and thereafter, handed those accused persons to police. Page No.# 3/4 Accordingly, Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 209/2024 under Sections 75/140(3)/62 of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012 was registered. 4) By order dated 23.09.2024, the Court called for the case diary of said Abhayapuri P.S. Case in the connected BA No. 2890/2024. 5) From the case diary placed before the Court today by the learned Addl. PP, Assam, it is seen that on an application of the Investigating Officer of sais Abhayapuri P.S. Case and pursuant to order dated 17.09.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, North Salmara, Abhayapuri therein, Section 4 of the POCSO Act, has been added in said Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 209/2024 with Sections 75/140(3)/62 of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 6) From the perusal of the records it is seen that date of birth of the minor victim was 22.02.2009 as per her Birth Certificate issued on 17.03.2009 by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, Abhayapuri, Community Health Centre vide Registration No. 199/2009 seized by the Investigating Officer of the case. As such, at the time of occurrence of the alleged incident on 01.09.2023 relating to the present petitioner the victim was more than 14 years 5 months. 7) Perused the statement of the minor victim dated 02.09.2024 recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, North Salmara at Abhayapuri under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023 as well as her statement dated 03.09.2024 recorded by the Chairperson of the Child Welfare Committee, Bongaigaon. Also perused, the statement of the minor victim recorded by the concerned Investigating Officer of the case under Section 180 of the BNSS, 2023. 8) From the statements of the minor victim, the witnesses acquainted with the case so far recorded by the concerned Investigating Officer of the case, the materials in the case diary, it is seen that there are sufficient incriminating materials regarding involvement of the accused petitioner, who is of 26 years age, in the alleged crime where the minor victim in her all statements, noted above, has implicated the Page No.# 4/4 petitioner with regard to the alleged crime. Considering the same, this Court is of the opinion that his detention in custody since 02.09.2024 cannot be considered for his bail in said Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 209/2024. 9) As such, prayer of the petitioner, namely, Jahangir Alam for his bail in said Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 209/2024 stands rejected.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010200432024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./2933/2024o JAHANGIRoALOMo S/OoABDULoKHALEQUE,oVILL-oLATIBARIoPART-II,oP.S.-ABHAYAPURI,oDIST-o BONGAIGAON,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANRo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR,oASSAM 2:JAYANTIoRAY oW/OoLATEoDIPAKoRAY oVILL-oSINGIMARIoPART-II oP.O.-ABHAYAPURI oP.S.-ABHAYAPURI oDIST-oBONGAIGAON oASSAM oPIN-78338o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oNoUDDIN,oMS.oAoAKHTAR,MRoSoKoCHHETRY,MR.oMo ISLAMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oMSoPoDASo(AMICUSoCURIAE,oR-2)oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.