VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Halim Paramanik and 6 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
29 September 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
AB 2620/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010202182024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2620/2024o HALIMoPARAMANIKoANDo6oORSo S/OLT.oSOBILoPARAMANIKo R/OoALOMGANJoPART-VI,oP.S.oGAURIPUR,oDIST.oDHUBRI,oASSAM 2:oMAZEDAoBEGUM oW/OoABDULoSAMADo R/OoALOMGANJoPART-VI o P.S.oGAURIPUR oDIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 3:oABDULoSAMADo@oSAMADoALI oS/OoLATEoANSERoALIo R/OoALOMGANJoPART-VI oP.S.oGAURIPUR o DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 4:oIMRANoCHOUDHURYo@oSHAHIoIMRANoCHOUDHURY oS/OoABDULoSAMADo R/OoALOMGANJoPART-VI o P.S.oGAURIPUR o DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 5:oTALEBoALIo@oTALEB oS/OoMOHAMMADoALIo R/OoCHIRAKHOWA oP.S.oFAKIRGANJo DIST.oDHUBRI Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 6: MAMUD ALI S/O MOHAMMAD ALI R/O CHIRAKHOWA P.S. FAKIRGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 7: ABUL KALAM S/O MOHAMMAD ALI R/O CHIRAKHOWA P.S. FAKIRGANJ

DIST. DHUBRI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D K AGARWALA, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

:: BEFORE :: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R

30.09.2024

Heard Mr. D.K. Agarwala, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. I have also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.

¶2This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for pre-arrest bail

in

respect

of

C.R.

Case

No.990/2021,

under

Sections Page No.# 3/3 147/148/149/447/120(B)/326/307 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhubri.

¶3On 22.04.2022, in a complaint case, the trial court took cognizance of the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code along with some other sections of the said Code against the present petitioners and directed issue of summonses to the present petitioners.

¶4Mr. Agarwala submits that Section 307 of the IPC is a Sessions triable offence and whenever the petitioners will appear before the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, they shall be remanded to custody.

¶5The petitioners have submitted that they are interested in facing the trial.

¶6I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

¶7Since all the seven petitioners are interested in facing the trial, they should be given an opportunity to that effect.

¶8Therefore, it is hereby directed that on their appearance before the trial court in respect of C.R. Case No.990/2021, under Sections 147/148/149/447/120(B)/326/307 of the Indian Penal Code the petitioners, namely- (1) Halim Paramanik, (2) Mazeda Begum, (3) Abdul Samad @ Samad Ali, (4) Imran Choudhury @ Shahi Imran Choudhury, (5) Taleb Ali @ Abu Taleb, (6) Mamud Ali and (7) Abul Kalam, they shall be released on bail of ₹20,000/- each with sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of said authority i.e. Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhubri. The application for bail is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.