VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Nazim Uddin Barbhuiya and Anr v. The State of Assam and 4 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 September 2023
Bench
The Chief Justice, S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
Case no.
WA 330/2022

Judgment

ORDER Date : 21-09-2023

¶1The appellants herein have approached this court by way of this intra-court writ appeal for assailing the order dated 22.07.2022, passed by the learned Single Bench dismissing WP(C) 4573/2014 filed by the appellants herein and one Sri Mantu Baishya. It may be stated here that the said Sri Mantu Baishya has chosen not to challenge the judgment rendered by the learned Single Bench. The aforesaid writ petition came to be instituted by the appellants/writ petitioners with the following prayers: "Under the circumstances, it is humbly prayed that your lordships would be pleased to admit this petition, call for the records, issue rule, calling upon the respondents to show causes, if any, as to why a writ in the nature of certiorari/Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction shall not Page No.# 3/5 be issued quashing and setting aside the order No. DSW/(ICDS)E/1/2005/45, dated 11/01/2005 (Annexure-12) read with an order No. DSW(LC)489/2010/107 dated 24/09/2010 (Annexure-11) and also directing the respondent No. 1 and 2 to release the current and arrear salaries of the petitioners against their respective posts and after hearing the parties and on perusal of records make the rule absolute and pass other order or orders as your lordships may deem fit and proper."

¶2The appellants have projected a case in this appeal as well as in the writ petition that they were appointed as LDA-cum-typist on ad hoc basis in the office of the Child Development Project Officer, Dalgaon ICDS Project vide order dated

11.11.1998. The appellants claim that their appointments were against sanctioned posts. They further assert that they had filed an appeal dated 12.08.2003 before the Director of Social Welfare, Assam, praying for continuation of their ad hoc services and for payment of current as well as arrear salaries. When the appeal was not considered, they preferred WP(C) 7517/2003, wherein an interim order dated

16.09.2003 was passed requiring the Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam, to dispose of the appeal dated 12.08.2003 within a stipulated period of two months. The authorities were also directed to make payment of the appellants' current as well as arrear salaries and also to allow the appellants to continue in their service till disposal of the appeal. The Director of Social Welfare, Assam, disposed of the appeal of the appellants by order dated 14.03.2005 directing release of salaries of the appellants. However, significantly enough, in this order, there was no direction to continue the services of the appellants herein. As there was no pertinent direction to continue the services of the appellants, the Child Development Project Officer, Hailakandi, wrote communications to the Director of Social Welfare, Assam, seeking clarification in this regard, because the employees were claiming release of salary from April, 2008 to February, 2009.

¶3The appellants herein, thereafter, approached this court by filing WP(C) Page No.# 4/5 1564/2010 raising the grievance of not having been paid their salaries. The said writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 09.04.2010 requiring the Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam, to examine the grievances of the petitioners and to do the needful in accordance with law. The Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam, thereafter passed an order dated 24.09.2010 observing that the appeal of the appellants/petitioners had been disposed of with the pertinent observation that the appellants were appointed against non-sanctioned posts and as such their services were fit to be declared void and thus they did not have any right to continue in service. It was also clarified that in view of the order dated 11.01.2005, the question of payment of salary, as claimed by them, does not arise.

¶4The order dated 11.01.2005, issued by the Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam, has been placed on record wherein it has been mentioned that the petitioners (appellants herein) were appointed on ad hoc basis; they were illegally appointed in excess of the number of vacancies and they neither had a right to claim for continuation in service nor could they claim for payment of salary when they had not rendered their services after their release from their place of attached posting. It is clearly indcated in the order dated 11.01.2005 that the petitioners did not have the right to continue in service. WP(C) No.7517/2003 preferred by the petitioners was finally disposed of vide order dated 23.05.2012 with a categoric finding that the petitioners had been appointed dehors the recruitment rules and their appointments were purely temporary and adhoc and thus, no direction could be issued to reinstate the petitioners on their posts. The appellants thereafter filed the present writ petition, being WP(C) 4573/2014, challenging the orders dated 11.01.2005 and 24.09.2010 issued by the Director of Social Welfare, Assam.

¶5It may be stated herein that in the pleadings of the writ petition [WP(C) 4573/2014] the fact regarding disposal of WP(C) 7517/2003 vide order dated

23.05.2012 was not disclosed. The learned Single Bench, while deciding WP(C) 4573/2014 by the impugned order, has recorded a categoric finding that the Page No.# 5/5 petitioners have not made any averment with respect of the fate of their appeal dated

12.08.2003. We also find that the appellants/writ petitioners have conveniently omitted to disclose in the writ petition [WP(C) 4573/2014] the fact regarding the judgment dated 23.05.2012 rendered in the earlier writ petition [WP(C) 7517/2003]. Likewise, even in the subsequent writ petition [WP(C) 1564/2010], the fact regarding pendency of WP(C) 7517/2003 was not brought to the notice of the Court. It is thus clear that the appellants/petitioners have blatantly misused the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing repeated writ petitions concealing the factum of the earlier litigation in the subsequent proceedings. In this background, it is apparent that the petitioners are not entitled to any equitable relief because they have not approached the Court with clean hands.

¶6In view of the above, and since the appellants/petitioners were never appointed against sanctioned posts by following the recruitment rules, no relief, as sought for by the appellants/petitioners can be granted to them. Thus, while affirming order dated 22.07.2022 passed by the learned Single Bench that the appellants/writ petitioners tried to mislead the Court by suppression of material facts, we hereby dismiss the writ appeal with Cost of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) on each of the appellants.

¶7The Cost shall be deposited before the Registry of this Court within thirty days from today. Upon the Cost being deposited, the same shall be appropriated in the funds of the Assam State Legal Services Authority.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010202302022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWA/330/2022o NAZIMoUDDINoBARBHUIYAoANDoANR.o S/O-oLATEoABDULoJABBARoBARBHUIYA,oRESIDENToOFoVILLAGE-o NARAINPURoPART-IV,oP.O.-oNARAINPUR,oP.S.-oALGAPUR,oDIST.-o HAILAKANDI,oASSAM,oPIN-o788101 2:oANAMoUDDINoMAZUMDER oS/O-oLATEoABDULoJABBARoMAZUMDER oVILLAGE-oBASHDAHARoPt.I oP.O.-oMATIJURY oP.S.-oALGAPUR oDIST.-oHAILAKANDI oASSAM oPIN-o78815o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoandoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oSOCIAL WELFAREoDEPTT.,oDISPUR,oASSAM,oGUWAHATI-06 2:THEoDIRECTOR oSOCIALoWELFARE oASSAM oUJANBAZAR oGUWAHATI-o781001 3:DISTRICToSOCIALoWELFAREoOFFICER oHAILAKANDI oP.O.-oANDoP.S.-oHAILAKANDI oDIST.-oHAILAKANDI oASSAM Page No.# 2/5 PIN- 788151 4:CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER ALGAPUR ICDS PROJECT P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788150 5:CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER LALA ICDS PROJECT P.O.- LALA DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.