VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Dwipen Sarmah v. Hemanta Kumar Adhikary and Anr

Dismissed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
18 August 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
Crl.Pet. 1026/2022

Judgment

ORDER 19-08-2024 Heard Mr. P K Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. N Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent No. 2. Page No.# 2/2

¶2It is submitted before the Court by Mr. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati by its order dated

10.03.2021 passed in C.R. Case No. 6295C/2018 rejected the claim of interim compensation filed under Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 payable to the petitioner by the respondent No. 1. Thereafter, by judgment dated 16.06.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati in Criminal Revision No. 20/2021 rejected the said revision petition of the petitioner upholding the order of the learned SDJM No. 1, Kamrup

(M), Guwahati dated 10.03.2021. Hence, the petitioner filed this criminal petition being aggrieved with those two orders dated 10.03.2021 and 16.06.2022, noted above.

¶3Mr. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during pendency of this criminal petition, the learned SDJM No. 1, Kamrup (M), Guwahati disposed of the said C.R. Case No. 6295C/2018 preferred by the petitioner as a complainant against the respondent No. 1, convicting the said respondent No. 1 for the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act vide judgment dated 07.07.2024 and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 (six) months and to pay compensation of Rs. 6,00,000/- to the complainant/petitioner, in default to pay such compensation, to undergo simple imprisonment for another 3 (three) months.

¶4As such, Mr. Kalita, learned counsel, on instruction, has submitted that in view of the above, the petitioner is not pressing this petition.

¶5Accordingly, this criminal petition, being not pressed, stands dismissed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010203442022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1026/2022 DWIPEN SARMAH S/O- LATE GOPAL SARMAH, C/O- CREATIVE POLYPACK INDUSTRIAL AREA, P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAN, P.S. CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-781008, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS HEMANTA KUMAR ADHIKARY AND ANR PROPRIETOR OF ADHIKARY PAT MUGA UDYOG, S/O- LATE SRICHAND JALAN, HOUSE NO. 8, SANTI PATH NABIN NAGAR, P.O. ZOO ROAD, P.S. CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-781024, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM AND ANOTHER ADDRESS- HEMANTA KUMAR ADHIKARY, S/O- LATE BHAGABAN CHANDRA ADHIKARY, P.O. BORSOLA, P.S. DHEKIAJULI, SONITPUR, PIN- 784110, ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE P.P. ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P DAS, MR. P JAIN,MR A SARMA,MR P PRAWAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.