VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Baten Ali v. The State of Assam

Closed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
7 January 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 3273/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 08-01-2024 Heard Mr. K. Mira, learned counsel for the petitioner Baten Ali. Page No.# 2/3 The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as he is behind bars since 06.03.2023 in connection with Session Special Case No. 92/2023 arising out Dispur Police Station Case No. 393/2023 under Section 376(3) IPC read with Section 6 POCSO Act, 2012. Heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No. 1 State of Assam. Notice has been issued to respondent No. 2. Seen the additional affidavit submitted by the petitioner relating to service of notice on the respondent No. 2. Seen the police report relating to service of notice on respondent No. 2 annexed with the additional affidavit. The respondent No. 2 is not represented today. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that charge was framed against the present petitioner on 01.08.2023. I have considered the submissions at the bar that not a single witness has been examined since 01.08.2023. The petitioner is 62 (sixty two) years old. He is a local resident. The petitioner has pledged to abide by any bail conditions purported to be imposed upon him. It is submitted that at this stage the petitioner may not be detained further. Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge POCSO, Kamrup(M) under the conditions that:

(1) The petitioner shall not go near the vicinity of the victim. Page No.# 3/3

(2) The petitioner shall not exercise threats to the witnesses.

(3) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence.

(4) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission till completion of the trial,

(5) the petitioner shall cooperate with the trial. On breach of any bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled. Bail Application stands disposed of. Send back the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010203582023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3273/2023 BATEN ALI S/O LATE RAIJ UDDIN R/O VILL- BALKURI, P.S. KALGACHIA DIST. BARPETA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM 2:MD. MAHMAD ALI S/O LATE GAHAR ALI R/O VILL- BURABURI P.S. MAYANG DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78241 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K MIRA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.