- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 October 2023
- Bench
- Lanusungkum Jamir, Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- WA 131/2016
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010203732016 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWA/131/2016o MDoLUTFURoRAHMANo S/OoLT.oHABIBARoRAHMANoR/OoKHATABARI,oWARDoNO.o1,oP.O.oNALABARI, DIST.oNALBARI,oASSAM. VERSUSo SANKARDEVoNAMGHARoSAMITYoMOROWAoando12oORSo DIST.oNALBARI,oASSAM,oREP.oBYoITSoVICE-oPRESIDENToSHRIoGIRISHo BAISHYA. 2:SRIoGIRISHoBAISHYA oS/OoLT.oRAMESWARoBAISHYAoR/OoNALBARI oASSAM. 3:SRIoARJUNoBAISHYA oS/OoLT.oMANIoRAMoBAISHYAoR/OoVILL-oMOROWAo oP.O.oMOROWAoDIST.oNALBARI oASSAM. 4:SRIoNRIPENoCHANDRAoBAISHYA oS/OoLT.oJOGESWARoBAISHYAoR/OoVILL-oMOROWA oP.O.oMOROWAoDIST.oNALBARI oASSAM. 5:SRIoNAGENoSEAL oS/OoLT.oTANUoRAMoBAISHYAoR/OoVILL-oMOROWA oP.O.oMOROWAoDIST.oNALBARI oASSAM 6:INDIANoOILoCORPORATIONoLTD. oREP.oBYoITSoGENERALoMANAGER oNORTHoEASToINTEGRATEDoSTATEoOFFICE oEASToPOINToTOWER oBAMUNIMAIDAN oGUWAHATIo-o781021. Page No.# 2/4 7:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER LPG INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ASSAM OIL DIVISION DIGBOI DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN - 786171. 8:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER L.P.G. NORTH EAST INTEGRATED STATE OFFICE EAST POINT TOWER BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI -21. 9:THE SENIOR MANAGER INTEGRATED AREA OFFICE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. DR. B.K. KAKATI LANE ULUBARI GUWAHATI -07. 10:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NALBARI ASSAM. 11:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NALBARI ASSAM. 12:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BARBHAG REVENUE CIRCLE DIST. NALBARI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.D MUSAHARY Advocate for the Respondent : MR.I CHOWDHURYR-1-4 and 6
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
05.10.2023 O R D E R (lanusungkum Jamir, J.)
Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel, assisted by Mr. N. Gautam, Page No.# 3/4 learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. N.J. Khataniar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 2, 3, 4 and 6. It is submitted that during pendency of this writ appeal, parties have entered in an agreement that the respondent Nos.1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 have no grievance against the appellant and have decided not to pursue the prayer made in WP(C) No.5111/2012. The agreement dated 10.08.2023 is placed before this Court and the same reads as under:- "This Memorandum of Understanding made and entered into on this 10th day of August Two Thousand and Twenty Three B E T W E E N
¶1SANKARDEV NAMGHAR SAMITY MOROWA, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM, REP BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT SHRI GIRISH BAISHYA; 2. SRI GIRISH BAISHYA, S/O LT. RAMESWAR BAISHYA R/O NALBARI ASSAM; 3. SRI ARUN BAISHYA S/O LT. MANI RAM BAISHYA R/O VILL MOROWA PO. MOROWA, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM; 4. SRI NRIPEN CHANDRA BAISHYA S/O. LT JOGESWAR BAISHYA, R/O VILL MOROWA PO. MOROWA, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM; and 5. SRI NAGEN SEAL, S/O. TANU RAM SEAL, R/O VILL MOROWA PO. MOROWA, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM hereinafter called the First Party of the One Part.
AND MD LUTFUR RAHMAN S/O. HABIBAR RAHMAN R/O KHATABARI, WARD NO.1, PO. NALBARI, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM hereinafter called the Second Party (which expression shall where the context so admits include its successors and permitted assigns) of the OTHER part. WHEREAS the FIRST PARTY was petitioner in WP(C) 5111/2012 which was disposed of by order dated 15.03.2016 in favour of the First Party by the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court. Thereafter the SECOND party preferred a WA 131/2016 before the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court which is pending disposal. WHEREAS the FIRST PARTY at present do not have any grievance against the Page No.# 4/4 SECOND PARTY and is not desirous to continue the litigation against the SECOND PARTY and as such the FIRST PARTY has decided not to pursue their prayer made in their writ petition which was allowed by the Hon'ble Learned Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court and has agreed on the following terms and conditions:-
¶1That the FIRST PARTY shall instruct their lawyer to submit before the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court that they do not have any grievance against the SECOND PARTY and is not desirous to continue the litigation against the SECOND PARTY and they have no objection if the WA 131/2016 pending before the Gauhati High Court is allowed in favour of the SECOND PARTY.
¶2That the FIRST PARTY shall sign any documents which may be required to put forward before the Hon'ble High Court that they do not have any objection if the WA 131/2016 pending before the Gauhati High Court is allowed in favour of the SECOND PARTY.
¶3The rights and/or liabilities arising to any party to this agreement shall not be assigned except with the written consent of the other party and subject to such terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed upon.
¶4The MOU has been executed in English language which shall be binding and controlling language for all purposes of the MOU. Further the MOU has been executed in Nalbari, Guwahati after paying necessary stamp duties of Assam." In view of the aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding made between the parties, this Appeal is closed by merging the order of the learned Single Judge with the agreement made between the parties.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.