VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Sandip Das @ Sandeep Das v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 January 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 3103/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 22-01-2024

¶1Heard Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner Dr. Sandip Das @ Sandeep Das.

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 of the Code of Page No.# 2/3 Criminal Procedure with prayer for pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Nalbari Police Station Case No. 366/2023 under Section 304(A)/376/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 5(e) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

¶3Heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No. 1 State of Assam.

¶4The FIR unfolds that the deceased was suffering from Lipoma on her hand and as advised by the doctor, the deceased underwent operation. During the operation, the victim/deceased passed away, but this was concealed. Finally the victim/deceased was taken to the GNRC where she was declared as dead stating that the deceased was admitted as a patient of brain death. It is alleged that the victim was administered excessive anesthesia which resulted in her death.

¶5It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the co-accused Dr. Syed Zamanur Rahman @ Jamanur Rahman who also conducted the operation along with the present petitioner was granted pre-arrest bail vide order dated

17.10.2023 by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Case No. AB/3035/2023.

¶6Both the accused Dr. Sandip Das @ Sandeep Das and Dr. Syed Zamanur Rahman @ Jamanur Rahman preferred a criminal petition against the present case and the proceeding of the present case has been stayed against both the accused. Vide order dated 13.09.2023 the present petitioner was granted interim bail.

¶7I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection. It is submitted that this is indeed an unfortunate case of medical negligence. The petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has cooperated Page No.# 3/3 with the investigation. The petitioner has not violated any bail conditions. The petitioner is willing to abide by any bail conditions to be imposed upon him.

¶8I have also perused the case diary.

¶9Considering all aspects, the interim order dated 13.09.2023 is hereby made absolute.

¶10Send back the case diary. Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010204192023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3103/2023 SANDIP DAS @ SANDEEP DAS S/O SATYENDRA CHANDRA DAS R/O HOUSE NNO. 1418 NH 37 TETELIA NURSERY MLG RLY HQS GUWAHATI 781011 DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:NAMITA BAISHYA W/O BAPAN BAISHYA R/O VILL. BAGURIHATI P.S BELSOR DIST. NALBARI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BORA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.