Smti. Milu Bala Ray v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

ORDER

16.08.2024

Heard Mr. A Roshid, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. H Sarma, the learned Government Advocate appears for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3.

¶2The petitioner has approached this Court challenging a notice enclosed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition whereby the petitioner was asked to appear on

09.06.2016 at 11A.M., in the office of the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Bongaigaon in connection with an application filed for partition of the land described in the said notice.

¶3Taking into account the provisions of Section 99 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886, this Court finds no infirmity in the said notice enclosed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition.

¶4Accordingly, the instant writ petition is devoid of any merit for which the same stands dismissed. It is however, made clear that the petitioner would always be at liberty to file their objection(s), if the said partition proceedings had not yet been disposed of.

¶5Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010205122016 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3752/2016o SMTI.oMILUoBALAoRAYo D/OoLT.oTARANUoRAY,oW/OoSUDIRoDAS,oR/OoJAGIGHOPA,oP.O.oJAGIGHOPA,o DIST-oBONGAIGAON,oPIN-783382 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oDEPTT.oOFoLANDoREVENUE,o DISPUR,oGHY-6 2:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER oBONGAIGAON 3:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICER oBOITAMARI oP.O.oBOITAMARI oDIST-oBONGAIGAON 4:JOGESHoCH.oRAY oS/OoLT.oTARANUoRAY oVILL.oandoP.O.oJAGIGHOPA oDIST-oBONGAIGAON oPIN-78338o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Advocate1for1the1petitioner(s):111Mr.1A1Roshid 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Advocate1for1the1respondent(s):1Mr.1H1Sarma Page No.# 2/2 Government Advocate, Assam B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH