- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 6 August 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- WP(C) 5507/2023
Judgment
O R D E R
07.08.2024
Heard Mr. A. Rahman, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. A Bhattacharjee, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue Department as well as Mrs. S. Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents.
¶2The petitioner herein has approached this Court being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in releasing the ex-gratia amount of Rs.2,00,000/- in terms with the Notification dated
15.11.2014.
¶3This Court duly takes note of the materials on record including the Police Report. From a perusal of the record as well as the Police Report, it is seen that on 06.03.2021, at about 10:00 a.m., the husband of the petitioner, namely, Durgeswar Deka was knocked down by an EON car bearing Registration No.AS-02P-0336 at Kakatigaon Balimahal Road as a Page No.# 3/4 result of which the husband of the petitioner died on the spot.
¶4This Court takes note of the judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 21.06.2024 in the case of Monisa Khatun @ Monisha Khatun vs. the State of Assam and 5 Ors. {WP(C)No.2700/2023}. In the said judgment, the Coordinate Bench of this Court categorically held that the Notification dated 15.11.2014 cannot be read to be applicable in respect to all accidents except hit and run case where the offending vehicle remain unidentified in the Final Form after the police investigation. Paragraphs Nos.16 and 17 of the said judgment being relevant are reproduced hereinunder: "16) The question is whether petitioner is entitled for ex gratia compensation under notification dated 15.11.2014, when just and fair compensation for accident involving motor vehicle accident can be otherwise claimed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. 17) The notification dated 15.11.2014, envisaging grant of compensation is found to be relatable to provide ex gratia and financial assistance to the persons who were killed/ injured due to extremist violence/terrorist violence/ acts of miscreant/ communal violence/ ethnic violence/ group-clash/ firing of security forces/ accident, etc., who were kidnapped/ abducted by the extremist/ terrorist/ miscreants and whose dwelling houses are fully burnt/ damaged whether due to acts of extremist/ terrorist/ miscreants or during communal violence/ ethnic violence/ group clash. Therefore, accident must be in connection with acts committed by extremist, terrorist, or miscreants, or accidents arising out of group clash, communal violence, and ethnic violence. The said notification dated 15.11.2014, cannot be read as if all persons suffering from any accident except hit and run case where the offending vehicle remain unidentified in the Final Form after police investigation, would become entitled to ex gratia where other statutory remedy is available." Page No.# 4/4
¶5Taking into account the above proposition as laid down by the Coordinate Bench of this Court and the fact that the vehicle in question which had caused the accident has been duly identified, the petitioner herein would not be entitled to the benefit in terms with the Notification dated 15.11.2014. Be that as it may, this Court observes that the instant order shall not preclude the petitioner to avail other statutory remedies as provided under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
¶6Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010207552023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5507/2023o SMTIoJINAoDEKAo W/OoLT.oDURGESWARoDEKA,oVILL-BELTOLA,oP.O.-DHARAMTUL,oP.S.- DHARAMTUL,oDIST-MORIGAON,oASSAM,oPIN-782425 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo5oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.o OFoASSAM,oREVENUEoANDoDISASTERoMANAGEMENToDEPTT.,oRELIEFo ANDoREHABILITATIONoBRANCH,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-06 2:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oFINANCEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-06 3:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oNAGAON oP.O.-NAGAON oDIST-NAGAON oASSAM 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oNAGAON oP.O.-NAGAON oDIST-NAGAON oASSAM oPIN-782001 5:THEoOFFICERo-IN-oCHARGE oKAMPURoPOLICEoSTATION oP.O.-KAMPUR Page No.# 2/4 DIST-NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782426 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER OF MORIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE P.O.-MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78210 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. A. Rahman, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mrs. S. Sarma, Govt. Advocate Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, Advocate BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.