Nabam Hari v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010211742019

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1002/2019 NABAM HARI S/O-NABAM TAKEH, R/O-VILL-YUPIA III PAPUMA PARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REP. BY DIRECTOR CBI, NEW DELHI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M G SINGH, MR. M K DUTTA,MR. S K SINGHA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CBI,

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 21/08/2024 No representation on behalf of the petitioner on call, though names of three counsels have been reflected in the cause list. In the first half also, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the petitioner remained unrepresented. From the order sheet, it is seen that on the previous occasion, i.e., on 25.07.2024, the petitioner remained unrepresented. Page No.# 2/2 Heard Mr. M Haloi, learned Standing counsel, CBI for the respondent. By order dated 25.07.2024, it was already recorded that since 19.12.2019, the interim order passed earlier on 02.09.2019 observing that no coercive measure shall be initiated against the petitioner was not extended. This criminal petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of the regular case being R.C. Case No. 3A2019SHG, P.S. CBI/ACB, Shillong registered under Sections 120B/420 IPC read with Section 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act initiated against him. This criminal petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant