- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 15 August 2024
- Bench
- Vijay Bishnoi, Suman Shyam
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3094/2022
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010211952022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3094/2022o 1:oONoTHEoDEATHoOFoPARAMANANDAoBORAHoHISoLEGALoHEIRSoBANIo BORAHoANDoANR.oW/OoLATEoPARAMANANDAoBORAH,oRESIDENToOFo NABINoNAGAR,oL.K.R.B.oROAD,oGUWAHATI,oHOUSEoNO.o39,oP.O.oZOOo ROAD,oDIST.oKAMRUP(M),oASSAM,oPINo781024. 2:oPRIYANSHUoBORAH D/OoLATEoPARAMANANDAoBORAHoW/OoVAIBHAVoPANIoRESIDENToOFo NABINoNAGARoL.K.R.B.oROADoGUWAHATIoHOUSEoNO.o39oP.O.oZOOoROAD DIST.oKAMRUP(M)oASSAMoPINo781024.oPRESENToADDRESSoB-602 GURNAMIoMEADOWSoCHSoJAIoBHAVANIoMATAoROADoAMBOLIoANDHERI WESToMUMBAIoMAHARASHTRAoP.O.oANDHERIoDISTRICToMUMBAIoPINo 400058o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooVERSUSo 1:oSAUKOToALIoANDo5oORS.o S/OoLT.oMINURoALI,oR/OoKAKAJAN,oP.O.oKAKOJAN,o DIST-oJORHAT,oASSAM,oPINo785107. 2:THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoREP.oBYoTHEoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA MINISTRYoOFoROADoTRANSPORToETO.oDEPTT.oNEWoDELHI 3:THEoNATIONALoHIGHWAYoAUTHORITYoOFoINDIA THROUGHoITSoPROJECToDIRECTORoJORHAToDIST-oJORHAToASSAM 4:PROJECToDIRECTORoNATIONALoHIGHWAYoAUTHORITYoOFoINDIA JORHAToDIST-oJORHAToASSAM 5:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoREP.oBYoDY.oCOMMISSIONER JORHAToDIST-oJORHAToASSAM 6:ADDL.oDY.oCOMMISSIONERoCOMPETENToAUTHORITYoLANDo ACQUISITIONoOFFICERoOFoTHEoDY.oCOMMISSIONERoDIST-oJORHAT ASSAMoo Page No.# 2/2 For the Applicant(s) : Mr. P.J. Saikia, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Medhi, Central Govt. Advocate for respondent No.2. : Mr. C. Baruah, Standing Counsel, NHAI for respondent Nos.3 & 4. : Mrs. R.B. Bora, Junior Govt. Advocate, Assam for respondent Nos.5 & 6. – B E F O R E – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
16.08.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) The instant interlocutory application is preferred on behalf of the appellants with a prayer to allow the appellants to substitute the legal heirs of the appellant No.1, who is reportedly expired. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. Hence, the interlocutory application is allowed. The legal representatives of the appellant No.1 are allowed to be taken on record. The amended cause-title be filed within a period of 1(one) week. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.