Nazir Ahmed Laskar v. Roshan Kumar Jha, Ias and Anr

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010213752023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCont.Cas(C)/586/2023o NAZIRoAHMEDoLASKARo S/OoLATEoSUNAoMIAoLASKAR,oVILL-SIBPURoPART-I,oP.O.-HAZARIoGRAMo BAZAR,oDIST-CACHARo(ASSAM) VERSUSo ROSHANoKUMARoJHA,oIASoANDoANRo THEoDISTRICToCOMMISSIONER,oCACHAR,oP.O.-SILCHAR,oDIST-oCACHAR,o ASSAM,oPIN-788001 2:DEEPAKoGOSWAMI oTHEoEXECUTIVEoENGINEER oSILCHARoDIVISIONo(IRRIGATION) oKANAKPUR oSILCHAR oPIN-78880o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oAoMoSoMAZUMDERo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMS.oKoPHUKANo(R-1)oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE HONOURABLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMANoSHYAM ORDERo

05.02.2024 Heard Mr. A. M. S. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. K. Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and Mr. N. Page No.# 2/2 Upadhyay, learned counsel representing the respondent No.2. Ms. Phukan has produced a copy of the written instruction dated 03.02.2024 to submit that the name of the petitioner has been placed before the DLC for consideration as per the order of this Court and therefore, the order dated

21.11.2022 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.463/2022 has been complied with. Mr. Mazumdar has not been able to deny the said submission of the learned counsel for the respondent No.1. If that be so, nothing further survives in this contempt case. The Contempt Case is accordingly closed. A copy of the written instruction dated 03.02.2024 be retained in the record of this case.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant