- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 July 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- Crl.Pet. 1088/2022
Judgment
ORDER 17-07-2024 Heard Mr. M Hussain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. D Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent No.
¶1Petitioners herein are FIR named accused persons in Barpeta Police Station Case No. 2527/2021 registered under Sections 365/376/34 IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, read with Sections 9/10/11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. Aggrieved with the same, those FIR named accused persons preferred this criminal petition, praying amongst others, to set aside and quash the proceeding of said Barpeta P.S. Case No. 2527/2021. Charge-Sheet in the said Barpeta P.S. Case No. 2527/2021 was filed vide Charge-Sheet No. Page No.# 3/3 390/2022 dated 30.04.2022, against all the FIR named accused persons. Said Barpeta P.S. Case No. 2527/2021 was accordingly registered as Special POCSO Case No. 88/2022 before the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Barpeta and cognizance under Sections 365/376/34 IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, read with Sections 9/10/11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act was taken against all the FIR named accused persons, i.e., the present petitioners. Notice to the respondents in this case was issued on 31.10.2022, with the observation that interim prayer of the petitioners shall be considered after appearance of the respondent Nos. 2 & 3, the informants of the case. It is submitted that during pendency of this criminal petition, said Special POCSO Case No. 88/2022 arising out of Barpeta P.S. Case No. 2527/2021 was already heard and judgment was delivered. In view of the above, this criminal petition has become infructuous and on instructions of the petitioners, Mr. M Hussain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R Ali, learned counsel is not pressing this criminal petition. Accordingly, this criminal petition stands dismissed, being not pressed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010214462022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCrl.Pet./1088/2022o ARIFULoISLAMoAHMEDoANDo3oORSo S/OoBAHAZoUDDINoAHMEDo R/OoVILL-oGAGALMARIo P.O.oKADONG,oP.S.oBARPETAo DIST.oBARPETA,oASSAM 2:oBAHAZoUDDINoAHMED oS/OoLATEoBINODoALIo R/OoVILL-oGAGALMARIo P.O.oKADONG oP.S.oBARPETAo DIST.oBARPETA oASSAM 3:oANJUMoMANOWARAoBEGUM oW/OoBAHAZoUDDINoAHMEDo R/OoVILL-oGAGALMARIo P.O.oKADONG oP.S.oBARPETAo DIST.oBARPETA oASSAM 4:oHABIBARoRAHMAN oS/OoLATEoRASHEDoALIo R/OoVILL-oGAGALMARIo P.O.oKADONG oP.S.oBARPETAo DIST.oBARPETA oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM Page No.# 2/3 2:JALNUR UDDIN AHMED S/O TAIJUDDIN AHMED R/O VILL- BANGLIPARA P.O. JANIA P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781314 3:JERIFA WAHID REP. BY FATHER JAKIR HUSSAIN VILL- KANDAPARA P.O. KADONG P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78131 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.