- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 20 November 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.) 1118/2024
Judgment
ORDER
21.11.2024 Heard Mr Z Alam, learned counsel for the applicants, 1) Felix Peter Nongadhar, 2) Mostafa Hussain and 3) Md Taleb Ali Sheikh. They have filed this application under Section 430 of the BNSS, 2023, with prayer for suspension of sentence pending appeal also to allow the accused persons to go on bail as they have been convicted vide Judgment and order dated 23.09.2024, passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI, Assam, Additional Court No. 2, at Guwahati, in connection with Special Case No. 7/2014, under Section 120B and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 30,000/- each, with default stipulation, under Section 420 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs. 30,000/- each, with default stipulation, under Section 468 IPC and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs. 30,000/- each, with default stipulation and under Section 471 IPC, to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs. 30,000/- each, with default stipulation, and under Section 13(2), read with Section 13(1)(d) of the PC Act, 1988, to undergo RI for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs. 50,000/-each. The sentences are directed to run concurrently. Page No.# 3/3
¶2Heard Mr M Haloi, learned Special Public Prosecutor, CBI, who has submitted to file objection against this petition under Section 430 of the BNSS, 2023.
¶3I have considered the submissions at the Bar.
¶4It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are already on previous bail. Therefore, petitioners are allowed to remain on previous bail, until further orders. The operation of the conviction and sentence of the applicants/appellants/petitioners, vide impugned Judgment and Order dated 23.09.2024, is stayed until further orders.
¶5In terms of the above observations, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010214482024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:ooI.A.(Crl.)/1118/2024 FELIXoPETERoNONGADHARoANDo2oORS S/O.oANANDAoCHETIA oR/O.oJANAPATHoLANEo19 oCHANDANoNAGAR oP/S.oJORHAT oDIST.oJORHAT oASSAM oPIN-785001. 2:oMOSTAFAoHUSSAIN S/O.oLATEoSAFIULLAoMUNSHI oR/O.oVILL.oJHAGRARPAR oPART-3 oP/S.oDHUBRI oDIST.-oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-783325. o3:oTALEBoALIoSHEIKH S/O.oLATEoNOWSHADoALIoSK oR/O.oVILL.oGARAMARIoPART-4 oP/O.oALAMGANJ oP/S.oGAURIPUR oDIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM oPIN-783325. oVERSUS THEoCENTRALoBUREAUoINVESTIGATION REP.oBYoTHEoSPECIALoPP oCBI. o------------ Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for : MR Z ALAM Advocate for : SC CBI appearing for THE CENTRAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.