- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 April 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- CRP(IO) 119/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 04.04.2024 Heard Mr. D. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.06.2023 passed by the Civil Judge, (Senior Division No.2), Kamrup(Metro), Guwahati in T.S. No.249/2013 rejecting the Petition No.3190/2022 filed by the petitioner under Order XIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner is a plaintiff before the trial Court. The petitioner prayed before the trial Court that one particular power of attorney being Power of Attorney No.2490/1999 is a forged document. According to the petitioner, the said power of attorney is now available in the criminal court in G.R. Case No.7845/2013 arising out of Hatigaon P.S. Case No.213/2013 pending in the Court of JMFC, Kamrup(Metro). The petitioner filed an application under Order XIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for calling the criminal record of M.R. Case No.78/2013. The trial Court refused to do so. After considering the submission made by Mr. Das and after going through the materials available on record, this Court is of the opinion that the learned trial Court has committed an error by refusing to call for the said record. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside. The trial Court is directed to call for the aforesaid criminal record more particularly M.R. Case No.78/2013. After the Page No.# 4/4 enquiry is done, the record shall be returned. With the aforesaid directions, the revision petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010214792023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCRP(IO)/119/2024o SUMIToBOROo S/O-oLATEoNAMALoBORO,o R/O-oKERAKUCHI,o BALORAMoBASUMATARYoPATH,o H.NO-25,oSAWKUCHI,o P.O-oSAWKUCHI,oGUWAHATI-40,oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAM VERSUSo KARMESWARoBOROoANDo6oORS.o S/O-oLATEoRAJENoBORO,o R/O-oBARSAJAI,oBHETAPARA,oRAJENoBOROoBYEoLANEo,o P.S-oBASISTHA,oGUWAHATI-29,oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAM 2:EASTERNoPRESSoANDoPUBLICATIONSoPRIVATEoLIMITED oREP.oBYoITSoDIRECTOR oDEBABRATAoSAIKIA o HAVINGoITSoREGD.oOFFICEoAToNANDANoNAGAR oSARUMATARIA oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-06 oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 3:DEBABRATAoSAIKIA oS/O-oLATEoHITESWARoSAIKIA o R/OoNANDANoNAGAR oSARUMATARIA oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-06 Page No.# 2/4 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4:JADU RAM KARJEE (TARANI) FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN C/O- (I) SECRETARY / PRESIDENT TARANI SANGHA CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT COMPLEX PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. (II)KARMESWAR BORO S/O- LATE RAJEN BORO R/O- BARSAJAI BHETAPARA RAJEN BORO BY LANE P.S- BASISTHA GUWAHATI-29 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE STATE OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (NOW KNOWN AS DISTRICT COMMISSIONER) KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 7:THE SUB REGISTRAR KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DITUL DAS Advocate for the Respondent : Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.