- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 January 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 3452/2023
Judgment
ORDER
12.01.2024 Heard Mr T Thakuria, learned counsel for the petitioner, Niraj Kumar and Mr M P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 CrPC, with prayer for bail, as he is behind bars since 05.07.2023, in connection with Guwahati GRPS Case No. 111/2023, under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act. Page No.# 2/3
¶3Case Diary has not been received.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted a certified copy of the order of the learned trial Court dated 02.01.2024. The copy will form a part of this record.
¶5It is submitted that the order reflects that vide order dated 02.01.2024, the co-accused have been granted default bail in connection with GRPS Case No. 111/2023.
¶6I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.
¶7It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner was arrested on
05.07.2023, but till 02.01.2024, charge sheet was not laid against the petitioner. The petitioner is entitled to default bail as mandated under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as the petitioner has filed this application on 29.02.2023 before any charge sheet was submitted against the petitioner.
¶8It is submitted that the petitioner is languishing in jail for more than 180 days.
¶9I have considered the submission that till 02.01.2024, charge sheet was not laid against the petitioner, who had preferred this bail application under Section 439 CrPC on
22.09.2023.
¶10It is true that the petitioner is booked under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/29 of the NDPS Act, but as charge sheet was not laid against the petitioner till 02.01.2024, the petitioner is entitled to bail. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs. 1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac) only with two local sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Page No.# 3/3 Judge , Kamrup (Metro), under the conditions that:-
i) the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged,
ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence.
iii) the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on every date fixed, and,
iv) the petitioner shall not jump the bail. On breach of any bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.
¶11Bail Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010215402023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3452/2023 NIRAJ KUMAR S/O MOHESHWAR ROY R/O P.S. AND DIST. BUXAR, BIHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T THAKURIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.