Abdul Hannan Khan v. Zadid Iqubal Alam

ORDER

21.10.2024

Heard Md. A. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent Page No.# 2/2 No.1. By this interlocutory application under Section 430(1) of BNSS, the petitioner has prayed for suspension of sentence and for allowing the applicant to remain on previous bail during the pendency of the Revision Petition. It appears that the accused petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of NI Act and sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 17,50,000/- in default, SI for three months. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was on bail during trial and appeal before the Sessions Court. Accordingly, the petitioner is allowed to remain on previous bail during pendency of the revision petition. Accordingly, the Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010216002024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/976/2024 ABDUL HANNAN KHAN S/O LATE ALEP KHAN R/O VILL- HARIPUR P.S.-TARABARI DIST- BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS ZADID IQUBAL ALAM S/O LATE NUR MAHAMMAD R/O VILL- DANGARKUCHI P.S.-BARPETA DIST-BARPETA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR A W AMAN Advocate for : appearing for ZADID IQUBAL ALAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI