- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 November 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- AB 2788/2024
Judgment
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010219022024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2788/2024 IRSHAD ALI S/O SAMAR ALI R/O VILL-FALIHAMARI PATHAR P.S. BHURAGAON DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA, MS S NASRAT Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
06/11/2024 Heard Mr. T Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.
¶2The petitioner, namely, Irshad Ali, has filed this application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending his arrest in Sootea P.S. Case Page No.# 2/2 No. 81/2024 registered under Sections 281/303(2)/317(2)/3(5) BNS, 2023 read with Section 13(1) of Assam Cattle Preservation Act, Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960.
¶3By order dated 21.10.2024, the Court called for the scanned copy of the records of said Sootea P.S. Case No. 81/2024.
¶4It is seen from the case record that police after completion of investigation of the case has submitted charge-sheet in said Sootea P.S. Case No. 81/2024 vide Charge-Sheet No. 69/2024 dated
30.09.2024 implicating the driver and the helper of the vehicle involved in the case and found that the petitioner is neither an FIR named accused nor a charge-sheeted accused in said Sootea P.S. Case No. 81/2024.
¶5In view of the above, this pre-arrest bail application, being devoid of merit, stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.