VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Dimbeswar Saikia v. The State of Assam and 6 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
1 February 2024
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 6998/2022

Judgment

ORDER Date : 02.02.2024

Heard Ms. R. Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Handique, learned standing counsel, P & RD.

¶2The prayer in this writ petition is for grant of full pension and other retiral benefits by considering the total length of service reckoned from the date of initial appointment of the petitioner in the service of the Panchayat.

¶3The petitioner retired from service on 30.11.2003 as a Secretary of Melamati Gaon Panchayat under Jorhat Zilla Parishad, on reaching the age of superannuation. The petitioner had joined in his service as Secretary of Page No.# 3/5 Bagurgaon Gaon Panchayat under Jorhat Zilla Parishad on 01.05.1964. During the tenure of his service, the State Government had enacted the Assam Panchayat Employees [Provincialisation] Act, 1999 ['the Act, for short] and as per the provisions of the Act, the provincialised Panchayat Secretaries are to be provided pension and other retirement dues in terms of the provisions of the Act. The services of the petitioner came to be provincialised accordingly in terms of the provisions of the Act.

¶4When a dispute arose as regards the date from which the period of services of the provincialised Panchayat Secretaries was to be counted for the purpose of pension and other retirement dues under the provisions of the Act, litigations ensued. A Division Bench of this Court in a writ appeal, Writ Appeal no. 145/2009 [The State of Assam & another vs. Syed Md. Fazlay Rabbi] and a batch of writ petitions in its common judgment and order dated 24.03.2010 set the issue at rest by holding that the benefits of the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Employees [Provincialisation] Act, 1999 [the Act] including those for pension and other retirement dues would be available to the provincialised employees in service on or after 01.10.1991 on the basis of the length of their services reckoned from the dates of their initial appointments. Special leave petitions, Special Leave to Appeal [Civil] Nos. 19351– 19360/2010 preferred against the common judgment and order dated 24.03.2010 were dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on 02.08.2010. Thereafter, the State Government in the Pension and Public Grievances Department issued a Notification dated 17.03.2011, whereby, it had ordered that the benefits of the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Employees [Provincialisation] Act, 1999 [the Act] including those for pension and other retirement dues applicable to the State Government Employees, would also be available to the provincialised Page No.# 4/5 Panchayat Employees who were in service on or after 01.10.1991 on the basis of the length of their service reckoned from the dates of their initial appointments in the service of Panchayats. The said Notification was issued with the concurrence of the Finance Department.

¶5The Pension Payment Order being PPO No. ADP/PRI/PPO/GPO/2012/000241, issued in respect of petitioner has specifically stated that the date of petitioner's entry in service is 01.05.1964 and the petitioner's date of retirement is

30.11.2003. The total period of service rendered by the petitioner was 39 years 6 months 29 days. Yet, the pension disbursal authority had calculated the petitioner's monthly pension @ Rs. 1,712/- per month with the observation that a period of 17 years 29 days could not be counted for the purpose of pension and the petitioner's net qualifying service would be only 22 years 6 months.

¶6A conjoint reading of the judgment and order dated 24.03.2010 passed in a writ appeal, Writ Appeal no. 145/2009 [The State of Assam & another vs. Syed Md. Fazlay Rabbi], the Notification dated 17.03.2011, unerringly points out to the position that for the purpose of pension and other retirement dues, the entire period service of 39 years 6 months 29 days from the petitioner's date of entry in service, 01.05.1964 to till his date of retirement, 30.11.2003 is required to be counted for the purpose of pension and other retirement dues. As such, the decision not to count a period of 22 years 6 months for the purpose of pension and making calculation of the pension amount on that basis is found to be incongruent and impermissible and accordingly, the same are set aside.

¶7As a corollary, the respondent authorities shall now work out the entitlement of the pension and other retirement dues of the petitioner by counting his total period of service as 39 years 6 months 29 days and issue a fresh Pension Payment Order in supersession of the earlier Pension Payment Order. The entire Page No.# 5/5 exercise shall be undertaken and completed within a period of 2 [two] months from the date submission of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner at the office of the respondent no. 4 and the respondent no. 5. In the event such exercise is not completed within a period of 2 [two] months from the said date, the same will carry an interest of 6% per annum.

¶8Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed to the extent indicated above. No cost.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010221682022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/6998/2022o DIMBESWARoSAIKIAo RETIREDoTAXoCOLLECTOR,oS/O-oLATEoAPURAMoSAIKIA,oVILL.-oPATIAo GAONo(TEKELAoGAON),oP.O.oMELAMATIo(TITABAR),oDIST.oJORHAT,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo6oORS.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOF ASSAM,oPANCHAYAToANDoRURALoDEVELOPMENToDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARY oTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oPENSIONoANDoPUBLICoGRIEVANCESoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6. 3:THEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARY oTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oFINANCEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6. 4:THEoCOMMISSIONER oPANCHAYAToANDoRURALoDEVELOPMENT oASSAM oJURIPAR oSIXMILE oGUWAHATI-37. 5:THEoDIRECTORoOFoPENSION Page No.# 2/5 ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JORHAT ZILLA PARISHAD JORHAT P.O. AND DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001. 7:TREASURY OFFICER TITABAR TREASURY P.O. TITABAR DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785630 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS RUKMINI BARUA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.