- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 25 April 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- AB 3433/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 26.04.2024
Heard Mr. I. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. N. Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
¶2This application under Section 438, Cr.P.C., is preferred by the applicant, namely, Abdul Karim, who has been apprehending arrest in connection with Page No.# 2/3 Sonapur P.S. Case No. 201/2023, under Sections 120B/379/411 of the IPC read with Sections 11(a)(b)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, read with Section 13(1)/14 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, for grant of pre-arrest bail.
¶3It is to be noted here that the aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by S.I. Surajit Sarkar of Sonapur P.S. on 18.09.2023. The essence of allegation made in the aforesaid FIR is that acting on a tip off the informant and other staff have apprehended one Truck, bearing Registration No.AS-23BC-5299, at Nazirakhat Toll Gate and during search of the vehicle, they have found 60 nos. of cattle, being carried without any valid document and in a very cruel and ruthless manner and on being asked the driver failed to produce any valid document and they have also apprehended one Toyota Glanza vehicle, bearing Registration No.AS-01FQ-7843, along with three persons, who were involved in passing the said Truck by keeping a watch on the police vehicle and the names of the culprits are Sarif Ahmed, Abidur Rahman, Atabur Rahman and Gulzar Hussain.
¶4Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had been granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail, vide order dated
10.10.2023, and pursuant to the said order, he had also appeared before the I.O. and his statement has also been recorded, and since he has been cooperating with the investigating agency and his name has not been mentioned in the FIR and no way involved with the offence alleged in the FIR, and therefore, a contention is being made that the interim order dated
10.10.2023, may be made absolute in the same terms and conditions.
¶5On the other hand, Ms. N. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that she has not received the case diary, but as per her instruction, the Page No.# 3/3 I.O. has laid charge-sheet, being charge-sheet No. 265/2023, dated 30.12.2023, under Sections 379/411 of the IPC read with Sections 11(a)(b)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, read with Section 13(1)/14 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act.
¶6In view of the submission of learned Advocates of both sides, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application by directing the applicant to appear before the learned Court below on or before 13.05.2024, and to apply for regular bail and in the event of such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law.
¶7Till then, interim order dated 10.10.2023 shall stand extended.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010223122023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3433/2023 ABDUL KARIM S/O TAHER UDDIN VILL- TELIA SAPARI P.O. TELIA SAPARI, NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.