- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 12 November 2024
- Bench
- Manish Choudhury
- Case no.
- RCRev. 562/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 13.11.2024
Heard Mr. R.I. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶2The instant contempt petition is preferred against non-compliance of the direction made in the Order dated 22.05.2024 passed in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1884/2024.
¶3The subject-matter of the writ petition pertained to refund of amount of air fare to the petitioner, which was deposited by the petitioner as a Haj pilgrim for chartered flight from Guwahati.
¶4On the previous date of listing, that is, on 06.11.2024, the learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] was asked to obtain instruction as regards receipt of the representation by the Chief Executive Officer, Central Haj Committee of India, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
¶4Today, Ms. K. Phukan, learned CGC has submitted, on instruction, that the sole respondent impleaded herein, namely, Mr. Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui is no longer holding the post of Chief Executive Officer and in his place, one Nazeem Ahmed has joined in the post Chief Executive Officer, Central Haj Committee of India, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
¶5In view of such instructions placed by learned Central Government Counsel, Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this contempt petition and to file a contempt petition afresh impleading the present incumbent Chief Executive Officer, Central Haj Committee of India, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
¶6In view of the above submission made by Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the Page No. 3/3 petitioner, this contempt petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Accordingly, the same is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.o1/3 GAHC010223852024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCont.Cas(C)/562/2024o AFTABoUDDINoMAZUMDERo S/OoABDULoMUSABBIRoMAZUMDER,oR/OoBHAJANTIPURoPT-II,o HAILAKANDI-788155 2:oSAIYADURoRAHMANoCHOUDHURY oS/OoSIRAJoUDDINoCHOUDHURY oR/OoRANGAUTI oHAILAKANDI oPINo788155 3:oABULoHUSSAINoLASKAR oS/OoLATIFURoRAHMANoLASKARoR/OoKANCHANPURoPT-I oHAILAKANDI-78G152.o oREPRESENTINGoTHEoHAILAKANDIoHAJJoPILGRIMSoWELFAREoo COMMITTEE oHAVINGoSAMEoCAUSEoOFoACTIONo VERSUSo MRoLEYAQAToALIoAAFAQUI,o CHIEFoEXECUTIVEoOFFICER,oCENTRALoHAJoCOMMITTEEoOFoINDIA,o BAITULoHUJJAJo(HAJoHOUSE)o7-A,oM.R.AoMARG,oMUMBAI-o400001,o MAHARASHTRA,oINDIA. AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoMEHBOOBoRAHMANoSODIAL,oMRoRoIoBHUYAN,MR.oMoHo SAIKIA,MS.oLoWAJEEDA,MR.oNoHoMAZARBHUIYANo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:o,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No. 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.