VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Jisoya Khaklari v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 September 2023
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 6986/2018

Judgment

ORDER Date : 22/09/2023

Heard Ms. H. Terangpi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. R. Baruah, learned Government Advocate.

¶2This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction of this Court for release of payments in respect of works executed by the petitioner.

¶3The petitioner claims to be a businessman and is engaged in supply, repairing and up-gradation works and other activities under the name and style M/S Priya Enterprise in the District of Udalguri (BTAD) Assam. He was allotted the following works by the Superintendent of Police, Udalguri, District: "OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE :: UDALGURI :: DISTRICT:: UDALGURI :: ASSAM Memo No. UDL/R/Clothing/2016/2309 dated 23/02/2016 To, M/S Priya Enterprise, Sastrapara (Miripara), Udalguri, Assam

Sub:- Please supply the following some mise articles to this office immediately & submit bill duplicate after completion of the supply for payment. The payment will be made subject to be availability of fund through monthly ceiling allotted time to time. Sl. No. Name of Articles Quantity

¶1Bamboo (Jati) - 40 Nos.

¶2Rope - 07 KG. Page No.# 3/4

¶3Sutli - 03 KG

¶4GI Wire - 02 KG

¶5BTC Wire (6mm) - 02 Coil

¶6BTC Wire (2mm) - 02 Coil

¶7Power Pluck Socket - 10 Nos.

¶8Line - 01 Tin

¶9Sand (one) Truck - 05 C.M.

Superintendent of Police Udalguri, Assam

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner duly executed all the supply orders referred above. However, inspite of completion of the supply orders to the satisfaction of the respondents, the bills raised by the petitioner for supply items executed remained pending. The outstanding payments required to be paid to the petitioner against all the supply items completed by the petitioner were shown as Rs. 15,84,502/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs Eighty Four Thousand and Five Hundred Two Only).

¶5Mr. S. R. Baruah, learned Government Advocate does not dispute the claims of the petitioner that the works have been duly executed. He, however, submits that the amount could not be released due to non-availability of funds. He fairly submits that the Department will release the outstanding payments as and when the funds are available and subject to proper verification of the works stated to be executed by the petitioner.

¶6Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents more particularly respondent No. 2, The Superintendent of Police to verify the claims of the petitioner in respect of the works executed and upon such verification, if the works are found to be Page No.# 4/4 duly executed and completed then the amounts required to be released in respect of such works executed be released to the petitioner expeditiously.

¶7The verification and subsequent payment, if required, be made to the petitioner will be in terms of the guidelines laid down in Tamsher Ali and Ors Vs. State of Assam and Ors reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1.

¶8The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

¶9Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010223862018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/6986/2018o JISOYAoKHAKLARIo S/OoNANDESWARoKAKLARI,oRESIDENToOFoVILLAGE-oMORIPARA,o HAMREN,oPO-oSASTRAPARA,oPS-oDUALGURI,oPIN-o784510,oDIST-o UDALGURI,oBTADoASSAM. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORS.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,oHOME,oDISPUR,oPIN-o781006,oDIST.-o KAMRUP(M),oASSAM. 2:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oUDALGURI oBTAD oASSAM.oSANKARoNAGARoRD. oUDALGURI oASSAMo784509. 3:THEoHEADoACCOUNTANT/oACCOUNTANT oOFFICEoOFoTHEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oUDLAGURI.oSANKARoNAGARoRD oUDALGURI oASSAMo784506 4:THEoM.T.O./oI.C oCLOTHING oPOLICEoRESERVEoUDALGURI oSANKARoNAGARoRD oUDALGURI oASSAMo784509o Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.