- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 6 February 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- AB 3447/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 07.02.2024
Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/3
¶2Apprehending arrest in connection with South Salmara P.S. Case No. 272/2023, under Section 379 of the IPC, this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant, namely, Shahinur Rahman, for grant of pre-arrest bail.
¶3It is to be noted here that the aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by Pramod Kumar Singh, Security In-charge, L&T Dhubri Phulbari Bridge on 06.09.2023. The essence of allegation made in the FIR dated 06.09.2023, is that on 27.07.2023, one Rokibul Islam and Shahinur Rahman had stolen 72 numbers of wheels of crane of L&T company and out of the 72 numbers of wheels, returned 11 numbers of wheels on 18.08.2023, and they have not returned the remaining 61 numbers of wheels, the value of which is Rs. 42,70,000/-.
¶4Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had been granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail, vide order dated
12.12.2023 and pursuant to the said order, he had also appeared before the I.O. and he has been cooperating with the investigating agency, and a contention is being made to make the interim order dated 12.12.2023 absolute in the same terms and conditions.
¶5On the other hand, Mr. Baruah, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that he has not received the case diary and as per his instruction, the I.O. has laid charge-sheet being charge-sheet No.255/2023 dated 23.12.2023, under Section 379 of the IPC.
¶6In view of the above, this Court is inclined to dispose of this application by directing the applicant to appear before the learned Court below on or before
23.02.2024 and to apply for regular bail and in the event of such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law. Page No.# 3/3
¶7Till then, interim order dated 12.12.2023 shall stand extended. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010226842023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3447/2023 SHAHINUR RAHMAN S/O ABDUS SATTAR AHMED R/O VILL- AMBARI SHOULIA, P.S. SOUTH SALMARA, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.