VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Promud Pradhan and 3 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
17 October 2023
Bench
Arun Dev Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 3587/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 17-10-2023 Heard Mr. P K Kalita, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. R.J Baruah, learned Addl. PP, Assam appearing for the state respondent. This application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is preferred by accused, namely, 1. Promud Pradhan, 2. Biswa Boro, 3. Ramit Bh. Chetry & 4. Binod Thapa. who were arrested on 04.09.2023 in connection with Jalukbari PS case No.523/2023 under sections 120(B)/447/147/148/149 /302/326 IPC. Case diary called for is received and the same is perused. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Investigation is almost over and the accused have been thoroughly interrogated by the investigating agency. There is no legal evidence against the applicant Nos.1, 2 and 4 i.e., 1. Promud Pradhan, 2. Biswa Boro, & 4. Binod Thapa to connect them with the alleged offence. The learned Counsel further submits that the applicants are in custody since 04.09.2023 and the conclusion of trial will take sufficient time. On the aforesaid grounds, prayer is made to release the applicants on bail. From the case diary it is seen that most of the witness specifically Page No.# 3/4 named one Amit Chetry, Arun Chetry, Krishna Thapa and Dhunu Basumatary, as the main culprit in committing the crime, inasmuch as the learned Addl. PP on instructions from the I/O submits that these persons are absconding and they are very influential person and there is a chance that they might influence the witnesses. Some of the witnesses also named Ramit Bh. Chetry, Rahul Deka and Dhireswar Brahma in the commission of the offence and beating the deceased. However, the present petitioners namely, Promud Pradhan, Biswa Boro and Binod Thapa are not specifically named by the eye witnesses, though it is alleged that the group of accused consisted of 13 to 15 persons. Looking at the facts and circumstances of the case and on a perusal of the materials available on record, this court without commenting anything on the merits of the case is of the opinion that no further custodial interrogation/detention of the petitioners Promud Pradhan, Biswa Boro and Binod Thapa is required. Accordingly, the present application so far relating to the applicants 1. Promud Pradhan, 2. Biswa Boro, & 4. Binod Thapa arrested in connection with the aforementioned case be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M), with the following conditions: I. The applicant shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the aforesaid police station without prior written permission from its officer in charge; II. The applicant shall not hamper with the investigation of the case and tamper with the evidence of the case; III. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of Page No.# 4/4 the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. So far as the applicant No.3 Ramit Bh. Chetry is concerned, in view of the materials available and as discussed hereinabove, it stands rejected at this stage. In terms of the above, this bail application stands dismissed. Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010233412023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./3587/2023o PROMUDoPRADHANoANDo3oORS S/OLATEoMOHANoPRADHANo R/OMITHAoAAMTOLo P.S.oJALUKBARIo DIST.oKAMRUPo(METRO) oASSAM 2:oBISWAoBARO S/OoSRIoLAKHIoBOROo R/OoMITHAoAAMTOLo P.S.oJALUKBARIo DIST.oKAMRUPo(METRO) oASSAM o3:oRAMIToBH.oCHETRY S/OoSRIoOMoBAHADURoCHETRYo R/OoMITHAoAAMTOLo P.S.oJALUKBARIo DIST.oKAMRUPo(METRO) oASSAM o4:oBINODoTHAPA S/OoLATEoBIRMANoTHAPAo R/OoMITHAoAAMTOLo P.S.oJALUKBARIo DIST.oKAMRUPo(METRO) oASSAM oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM REP.oBYoTHEoPP oASSAM Page No.# 2/4 ------------ Advocate for : MR P K KALITA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.