- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 February 2023
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 3002/2022
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010228252022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/3331/2022o RAHIMoALIo@oABDULoRAHIMoANDo5oORS.o S/O-oLT.oHUSSAINoALI,oR/O-oPURAGAON,oP.O.oCHUKRUNGBARI,oP.S.o SORBHOG,oDIST.-oBARPETA,oASSAM,oPIN-o781317 2:oMOSTAFAoALIo@oMUSTAFAoALI oS/O-oLT.oHUSSAINoALI oR/O-oPURAGAON oP.O.oCHUKRUNGBARI oP.S.oSORBHOG oDIST.-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781317 3:oMUSLIMoUDDIN oS/O-oLT.oEMANoALI oR/O-oPURAGAON oP.O.oCHUKRUNGBARI oP.S.oSORBHOG oDIST.-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781317 4:oMUSLIMoUDDINoKHAo@oMACHLIMoUDDIN oS/O-oLT.oMAHARUDDIN oR/O-oPURAGAON oP.O.oCHUKRUNGBARI oP.S.oSORBHOG oDIST.-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781317 5:oAKKASoALI oS/O-oSAMADoALI oR/O-oPURAGAON Page No.# 2/5 P.O. CHUKRUNGBARI P.S. SORBHOG DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781317 6: ABBAS ALI S/O-SAMAD ALI R/O-PURAGAON P.O. CHUKRUNGBARI P.S. SORBHOG DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78131 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N N JHA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Linked Case : Bail Appln./3002/2022 FAIZUDDIN ALI @ FAIZUDDIN AND 2 ORS. S/O-LATE MAHIRUDDIN
R/O-PURAGAON
P.O-CHUKRUNGBARI
P.S-SORBHOG
DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781317 2: SAHJAHAN ALI S/O-MUSLIMUDDIN Page No.# 3/5
R/O-PURAGAON
P.O-CHUKRUNGBARI
P.S-SORBHOG
DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781317 3: SAHANUR ALI S/O-MUSLIMUDDIN
R/O-PURAGAON
P.O-CHUKRUNGBARI
P.S-SORBHOG
DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781317
REP. BY SAMIRON NESSA W/O-SAHJAHAN ALI AGE-36YRS R/O-PURAGAON
P.O-CHUKRUNGBARI
P.S-SORBHOG
DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781317 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. N N JHA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 4/5
B E F O R E HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
03.02.2023
¶1Heard Mr. N.N. Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent.
¶2This application under Section 439 Cr.P.C, is preferred by the petitioners, namely, Faizuddin Ali @ Faizuddin, Sahjahan Ali, Sahanur Ali, who are languishing in jail hajot since
21.07.2022, in connection with PRC Case No. 1061/2022, under Sections 341/324/325/326/34 IPC and added Section 302 IPC arising out of Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 96/2022.
¶3It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that a clash between both the parties erupted and both parties' sustained injuries. It is submitted that the petitioner no. 4, Muslim Uddin Kha @ Machlim Uddin sustained grievous injuries, as a result of the incident. The injury report of the petitioners Muslim Uddin and Abdul Rahim has been annexed marked as Annexure-3 series and tagged along with this petition. As all the petitioners were injured and were undergoing treatment and they were not aware of this case. The charge-sheet was laid against them showing them absconders. It is submitted that the petitioners will co-operate with the trial. The petitioners are not responsible for the death of the victim Majnu Ali who succumbed to injures as a result of the incident.
¶4The learned Addl. P.P. has raised serious objections that there are cogent materials against the petitioners. The statement of the witnesses and the complainant clearly depicts that the petitioners are responsible for the death of the Majnu Ali and grievous injuries of the other injured person. The FIR was lodged on 15.07.2022 and finally charge-sheet has been laid against the petitioners on 13.09.2022.
¶5I have considered the submissions at the Bar.
¶6It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have been languishing in the jail for Page No.# 5/5 more than 160 days. The charge-sheet has been laid against them. The petitioner has pledged that they will abide by any conditions of bail imposed upon them. They are not flight risks as they are local residents. The petitioners are sole breadwinners of their families.
¶7I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions at the Bar.
¶8The petitioners have been languishing in jail for 160 days. The petitioners are a local residents.
¶9Considering all aspects and in view of the foregoing discussions, the petitioners, namely, Faizuddin Ali @ Faizuddin, Sahjahan Ali, Sahanur Ali are to be enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/- each with a suitable surety each of like amount to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, at Barpeta This petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.